this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
628 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22161 readers
5117 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 45 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

I don't care who gets bitchy over this;

America chose bald faced fascism and genocide, over the chance to end genocide and not-fascism.

Suck eggs, whenever you can save up for them. The stay-at-homes are just as guilty.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

America chose bald faced fascism and genocide, over the chance to end genocide and not-fascism.

There was no chance under biden or harris that the genocide would end without running to completion. None. They're both centrists, and genocide is the only policy I've never seen a centrist abandon.

Voted harris but refuse to carry water for genocide supporters.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One of the parties is against the genocide in Ukraine. Funny how you people always forget about that one. Bit inconvenient for your narrative huh

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "you people"?

Because in another recent discussion we had, you called me a russian, had that comment removed by the mods, and then whined about how unfairly you were being treated by the complicit mods for enforcing their rules.

This sure looks like you're trying to call me a russian again without saying it outright.

We should have used all the resources that we wasted supplying the genocide that centrists dearly love in Gaza and used them to shore up Ukraine. Instead, netanyahu got his weapons no questions asked, while Ukraine had to wait for democrats to play stupid games with immigration bills first before getting around to the tiresome obligation of making a token gesture toward preventing putin from steamrolling Europe.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 29 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Sorry your blue team proto-fascists couldn't contain their disgusting bloodthirst enough to win the election from the red team fascists. Think outside of this bullshit electoralist thinking for just a second.

[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lol. You people are so silly.

[–] Gensidersposdie@lemmy.cafe 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sorry your favorite genocider lost. But hey At least you can find comfort in the fact the other genocider was worst.

Fucking loser

[–] elatedCatfish@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now I’m just convinced you’re a Russian troll, fucking idiot Nazi

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'll vote so hard for the 3rd party next time! Just your wait and see

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 7 points 4 days ago

Read the last sentence again please

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

You got the genocide you wanted either way. Now you get the bonus of being able to blame the people who tried to warn you what was going to happen.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There was no chance to end genocide.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Grater than this 0% ? Sure was.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago

It was always 0% because genocide is bipartisan.

[–] smol_beans@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

What makes you think there was a non zero chance with Harris? Anything she said or did? Because I got no indication from her campaign that there was any chance she'd end it

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Not with pro-genocide centrists running against pro-genocide fascists.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yes there was: not voting red or blue

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well, that's what happened and now you get extra genocide plus total capitulation to russia

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Crazy that Americans couldn't come up with a third, non-genocidal option.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

The way US elections work there mathematically cannot be a viable 3rd option.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If all third party voters swapped to Harris, she still would have lost. Vote shaming doesn't work and it's especially gross when it wouldn't even matter.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Based on the polls I saw, if 3rd party voters had voted Harris she would have won. Just going from memory, I'll have to look it up.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

What's your plan to stop the genocide? Begging the parties behind it to stop it?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That was the false sense of superiority choice, not the end genocide choice.

You have to consider the choices' actual effects on the world.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Making the correct choice has nothing to do with feeling better than others, it simply is the correct thing to do.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All those dead people thank you for making the "correct" choice.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If dead people had something to say i don't think they would be happy about the parties that backed their genocide

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah man, do whatever you can to absolve your inaction. I bet they appreciate it. Because if Harris was president and this attack did not happen then I assume you're pretty culpable. But hey- you "followed your conscience." Great stuff.

I tell people to grow up all the time. Realize the world isn't perfect but sometimes you gotta make dirty decisions to bring about the greater good. But you'd rather feel smug than give a shit and actually have to make a hard decision. Hopefully you're just young and have time to grow. Honestly.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Do you understand that both the red and blue party are backing the genocide? If your relatives were dying in gaza would you really vote for the lesser evil of the two, or would you supporting a party that actually want to stop the genocide?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Voting is not going to be what ends the genocide.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

probably not but breaking the red and blue duopoly can do some good.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That won't be done through voting either. Do you think Republicans are going to let themselves lose ever again?

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a big amount of red voters unhappy with trump but that voted for him because in their eyes he's "lesser evil" than blue and because "there's no alternative".

Once a third party gain enough traction to break the narrative that only red or blue can win it will be a landslide. In europe third parties wins all the time.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

What I mean is that Republicans are going to do everything they can to stop or rig elections so they don't have electoral consequences for Trump. Party organizing is going to need to take place outside of electoralism.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Suck eggs = children are dying and I’m gloating over it.

Anything to own the lefties though, eh.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

Stopping the genocide was never a choice in the table with the red and blue party