this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
1508 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15254 readers
1212 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the piece — titled "Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?" — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He made an elaborate test track specifically to make interesting observations.

He set up dozens of cameras to record interesting observations from multiple angles.

He collected footage of interesting phenomena he observed as they were happening in his elaborate test environment.

He then cut the footage up so much it’s impossible for us to say exactly what really happened.

If he went to all this trouble, and then made claims based on his experiment would it really hurt the video to explain the testing process a little bit more?