Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Yeah Buddhism would be solved if there was just death. That’s also why Buddhism minus cosmology ie “secular” Buddhism makes zero sense
It doesn't make sense logically but still nice in a "be nice to other people, reduce suffering" sense.
It can reduce suffering yes, but it removes all of the culture, philosophy, and traditional goals of a 2500 year tradition so some random “spiritual” person in America can be less stressed at their desk job. It’s a net positive but there is a lot more benefits to be had behind being mindful!
I just think it’s a shame. Like what the west did to yoga.
I was sort of involved a yoga cult for a while. I did basically a vedanta boot camp, twice, and while there were good things they did at the organization, the base model was authoritarian and manipulative.
I'm sure that there are plenty of people who find a lot of positive aspects of religion. But there are definitely people who use it to abuse their power over others, in any religion. That is why I don't choose to believe in anything supernatural.
That's why I'm trying to forge a path of respecting where Buddhism and Yoga come from, while not believing in the supernatural aspects. I don't think it removes the culture, it just rejects the supernatural part. Which I get is anathema to a lot of people practicing those religions, since they give you meaning.
And with yoga, it rejects the caste-division part as well. We had a lesson about how society was divinely ordered into different roles, and we shouldn't judge it by today's standards. That sounds like priestly apologia to me. There were literally stories in the mythos about lower-caste peoples devoting themselves to learning and the gods, and then the gods ordering them to cut off their own hands, for stepping out of line. No thanks.
We learned a lot about karma and divine grace, but it is not really part of the universe. And it is definitely used by the powerful to enrich themselves.
Like I said I don't think there is anything wrong with people who do believe finding meaning in their religion and not harming others. I think that's great. But I do not think I would be ashamed for not believing in it.
I have a memory of somebody asking the Dalai Lama what he thought of people bringing meditation and mindfulness to the West without bringing the Buddhist cosmology, and he was in favor of it -- meditation helps everyone.
//temporary reply to two points in your comment. May edit and add more later, can't save a draft of a comment!
The same could be said about anything. I cannot understand generalize a category as large as religion as abusive. Joining a cult once doesn't mean all religions are bad. Also, religion doesn't equal supernatural and that very much depends on how you define supernatural.
Buddhism is nothing without a belief in reincarnation. Buddha sought to solve the problem of death, old age, and sickness. You can't do that if you don't believe in his solution.
Kind of feels like being Christian but not believing in God.
Gotcha -- hopefully this clarification helps:
The way I understood Buddhism was that samsara involved reincarnation. I apologize if I'm mistaken. I really didn't know much about Buddhism. My branch of yoga borrowed very heavily from Buddhism but was its own thing (advaita)
I am generalizing that religion can lead to abuse. You're right that other things can as well.
To me supernatural means anything metaphysical, anything that cannot be disproven by observations in the physical world.
At my yoga place, they had a Hindu priest who did fire puja from time to time. This has a social function, but the idea that it appeases actual gods that will help us is supernatural thinking, in my opinion.
We mentally or physically chanted mantra. These are supposed to protect the mind, etc.. I'm sure there is a real component to this. But the idea that a word invokes a literal god that will help you is supernatural in my opinion.
There were indeed Christians who believed in Jesus's teachings but not in the supernatural aspects. Stuff like love your neighbor, love your enemy as yourself, forgive people, help people, we are all human beings. They were called Gnostics and they were persecuted by authorities. (EDIT: I might be wrong about the name, but I have heard that they existed).