this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67825 readers
4024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Over the 15+ years that we’ve had crypto, there have been only two viable uses. All others have failed:

Criminal activity (including brutal stuff like enabling NK/Russia and drug cartels)
Financial speculation (in of itself often a malicious activity where the goal is to dump your worthless bags on a mark)

Huh, Weird... Every use I've ever used crypto for doesn't fall into these two categories. So I guess your assumptions and thus everything you based your logic/responses on must be faulty and incorrect.

I use Crypto much like I use my second language/citizenship. Rarely... However, that doesn't mean I don't use it legally. And simply holding onto the crypto != financial speculation. Nobody treats a savings account as "financial speculation".

I've paid for plenty of things from my crypto wallets. Ranging from several to thousands of dollars.

And yes, I would like my payment for toilet paper and bell peppers to be private. Strictly for the fact that I don't want Mega-corpo stores to be able to track and advertise to me based on my payment method. "Club cards" to advertise/track you are a thing. Large chains can do this same thing with payment methods details. So yes, being "real" here, I not only require it, but demand it.

Your premise is bad. And based on your other responses you don't care to address it at all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nothing what you wrote contradicts my original OP.

You using crypto to buy your toilet paper is not a mass scale use case and it is irrelevant.

You can of course be pedantic and say, well I buy toilet paper with crypto therefore what you're saying is wrong.

Way to go man!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You using crypto to buy your toilet paper is not a mass scale use case and it is irrelevant.

So then you claim that being able to buy stuff isn't a "mass scale" use case...

You realize that's fucking stupid right?

As I said, I can and do buy things regularly (though "rare" comparatively with the normal fiat purchases) with crypto. Other's can do with me as well as the sites that I do it on do it as well. I can prove that by looking at the block chain and seeing the traffic in their wallets.

So "way to go man!" Unless you actually have something more meaningful than "nuh uh". You're kind of full of shit.

Edit: Lack of "big" vendors doing it != not possible at mass scale.

Dell at one point accepted crypto. They stopped because of regulation, not because of technical limitation. And sites like Newegg still accept it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The need for privacy in crypto is significant and a hinderance to wide adoption. With most crypto if you send me money once I then know your wallet address and I can then look up every transaction you've ever made with that wallet and every future transaction you make later. Clearly that's a problem.

The fact that criminals are more motivated by privacy concerns doesn't reduce the need and expectation of privacy for the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

you have basically ignored one part of their response, and invalidated the other part. good job!