this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
616 points (100.0% liked)

News

28185 readers
4633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't think the government should have ANY, regardless of how the government purchased the fake assets. It's a fucking terrible idea for exactly the reason you described. The government should not be involved in such a high risk, unsecured, volatile, ridiculously easily stolen venture.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Agreed. Its also a direct competitor with every countries sovereign currency... So why would help it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

When there's a disruptive force, you have a few options

  1. try to kill it so it can't disrupt

  2. do nothing and be disrupted

  3. dip you toes in, so if disruption happens you aren't blindsided and can hopefully wade through it

  4. take a chance and swim in it so you can be on the leading edge of that disruption.

They've kinda tried option 1 but failed.

Option 2 could lead to long term consequences

Option 3 leaves them prepared but not overly exposed

Option 4 would be pretty risky

So really, option 3 is probably the best bet given option 1 hasn't been working.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's bitcoin, the only thing it's disrupting is the pyramid scheme space. It's too volatile, too expensive(transaction fees), and too slow to be a useful currency. There is no reason for the government to buy in to a speculation bubble.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm not going to try and convince you on the merits of crypto, but it can be secured so it isn't "ridiculously easily stolen"

I just don't think Trump would do it.

Edit: Just to give an example - you could make it so you can't use the money without 100% of congress (house and senate) and the president authorizing it. It would be so secure, you'd probably never be able to use it ever again.