Technology

68130 readers

4840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

559

Papua New Guinea shuts down Facebook in test to stop 'pornography, misinformation, hate speech' (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Papua New Guinea's government has shut down social media platform Facebook, in what it describes as a "test" to mitigate hate speech, misinformation, pornography and "other detrimental content".

The test, conducted under the country's anti-terrorism laws, began on Monday morning and has extended into Tuesday.

Facebook users in the country have been unable to log-in to the platform and it is unclear how long the ban will go on for.

The government's move was not flagged ahead of the "test" on Monday — a move opposition MPs and media leaders have described as "tyranny" and an "abuse of human rights".

Facebook is by far the most popular social media platform in the country, with an estimated 1.3 million users, or about half of the country's estimated 2.6 million internet users.

The platform is a critical tool for public discourse in the country, with many highly active forums used to discuss PNG politics and social issues.

Yet, the government has been highly critical of Facebook with the platform often blamed for helping spread misinformation, particularly in light of a recent spate of tribal killings in the country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it really a problem for freedom of speech, if it's only a platform getting banned and not specific content?

If you are allowed to talk about anything still everywhere else on the web, I can't see the freedom of speech card being valid in this case about FB.

FB is already controlling what you see, making freedom of speech better without them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Look at what's really happening though: the state is implicitly saying you can have free expression provided your reach is miniscule/ineffectual. The moment you get traction is the moment it will move to block use of your preferred platforms, or simply hard-/algorithmically ban you - it's functionally identical to suppression of speech/association

They rely on the public's credulity when they insist freedoms are intact because 'only one website' is verboten. It's a dirty exploit. In reality, all platform denial should be protested

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Facebook exclusively promoted rage bait and is used as a propaganda machine, if anything they're circumventing a free and open space by not showing you everything in the first place.

If Facebook simply gave you a wall of every single thing pushed and didn't hide/promote things you would have a leg to stand on.