this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
630 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22365 readers
4474 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During Tuesday’s hearing, Gabbard told Warner that the Signal thread didn’t share any classified information but refused to share its contents, or even admit that she was on the chain.

“If it’s not classified, share the texts now,” Warner told Gabbard. “Share it with the committee. You can’t have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is our national security.”

Bitch, we can smell the bullshit 500 miles away.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In this context, bad opsec is hilarious.

In a dark comedy way.

I'm being facetious, a little satire, at your expense, because the call is coming from inside the house.

I think most people find this worth a laugh to cope with the horror of the reality, but you only seem to take this as a reason to be bad at liberals.

I suspect anything that fascists do is for you a reason to be mad at liberals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I suspect anything that fascists do is for you a reason to be mad at liberals.

To an extent yes, because who do you think let the fascists get in charge?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

who do you think let the fascists get in charge?

Everybody?

Obviously, first responsibility for fascists taking control goes to the fascists.

Next would be anyone who allies themselves with fascist or helps attack the opposition to fascists.

Next would be anybody complacent, who watched and did nothing.

Last would be the people who opposed the fascists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Next would be anyone who allies themselves with fascist or helps attack the opposition to fascists.

Exactly. Now realize that the most credible threat to fascism is/was the left and see where that puts pro-establishment liberals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

It's definitely not the left threatening fascists.

See again: weird left/MAGA alliance. Leftists and fascists united in their hate of liberals.

You're the literal proof of this, you were more bothered with random liberals online than the fascists dripping bombs on Yemen.