this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18418 readers
1543 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gamestop and its contemporaries scamming little kids out of their videogame money by paying them next to nothing for games, reselling them at a huge markup and giving exactly nothing back to the people who made the games.

Bookstores apparently scam readers when they buy books off of people and sell them to other people at a markup, and don't pay the publisher or author a cent.

It is literally the same business model.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is absolutely not. As I'm telling the other person with selective amnesia, Gamestop (and a couple of identical retailers worldwide) had dominant control over both the first sale and all resales and leveraged it to force abusive practices on game developers and publishers, competitors and their more vulnerable customers.

It wasn't a used book store, it was the equivalent of Amazon also owning 80% of the physical bookstores, telling writers which books would get shelf space, refusing to keep any stock unless someone had preordered it, then proceeding to aggressively hound readers to resell every one of their books and mark them up by several times the cut they got on a first sale, then using that additional second had profit to keep buying locations and driving smaller stores out of business.

That's not how used book stores operate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As I’m telling the other person with selective amnesia

Pointing out that you managed to precisely describe the used bookstore business model and unilateraly declare it wasn't the same isn't amnesia, it is having reading comprehension.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I did not. My actual response is still up there. Saying it doesn't say what it says doesn't magically rewrite it, that's a very weird thing to attempt.

I mean, you know I wrote it, right? I didn't forget, it was ten minutes ago. Nobody else is reading these.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

where they’re self-dealing by selling the games at full price, re-purchasing them for pennies and then reselling them for near-full price again.

Replace games with books in that sentence, that you typed, and tell me what the difference is. I will wait.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you even doing, man? That's a quote from four posts ago. Out of context, at that.

The term "gaslighting" is overused on the Internet, but misquoting myself at me while ignoring my own responses is... quite the attempt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you even doing, man?

Quoting you.

That’s a quote from four posts ago.

Yes that's how comment chains work.

Out of context, at that.

It is perfectly in context as you're describing the Gamestop business model in that quote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, it's not. You literally presented the same comparison and got a two paragraph description of how the two models aren't the same, which you're aggressively ignoring, I have to assume for the sake of trolling.

This conversation is bonkers and it is now over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

No you described the exact same core business model, and then complained about other tactics.

That you don't comprehend business models is very unsurprising given you don't understand how comment chains work.