this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

22614 readers
61 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see the headline and think "sooooo...?"

I read the article and I'm left continuing with the same question... They're trying to say that it's built on a library full of Nintendo code.

Whoop-de-fuck... Other than Nintendo, who cares? Why care? Libraries, SDKs, and drivers SHOULD be free and open source.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They also stole foss code though

Edit: The above statement is probably untrue

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.ca/comment/16203696

According to the comment posted above....they didn't?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No worries dude. At least you didn't double down! 👍

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd like to think I'm big enough to admit when I'm wrong

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, you're doing pretty good in my book.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Goddamnit....I'm too polite to end the conversation....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Understandable. Congrats on the Liberal Party's victory. May Canadians never be Americans.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How can one steal foss code if it’s free and open source?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not quite "steal", but they removed license and attribution information, which is a no-no and license infringement for sure.

But yeah, this is all of no consequence.

Edit: I just read DacoTaco's post below. Looks like there was no direct code liftup from RTEMS then, so I guess it's even more of a fuss over nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

They repackage it as proprietary in violation of the license