this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1164 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70048 readers
3598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 271 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Free speech absolutism at work

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fascist speech absolutism at work

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

To Der Elon that's the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s frustrating that we knew he was full of shit when he was saying it. And now the evidence is showing it is bullshit. And it’s like it doesn’t even matter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They know they can do that sort of shit because they hold the power. They can blatantly and unconvincingly lie, their followers will regurgitate those lies, but neither of them really believe them. They are just posturing and having fun with words, just like fascists always have done.

Never believe that [fascists] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The [fascists] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

That's a neat quote, what's it from?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

We knew it was bullshit about 3 days after he took over when he banned literally the 1 person he specifically said he was not going to ban.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

X restricted Imamoglu’s account in Turkey complying with a legal request by Turkish authorities who cited national security and public order concerns.

https://x.com/GlobalAffairs/status/1920426409358455081

"full of shit" = "standing up for free speech against governments that are trying to censor political opponents" ?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is what you quoted "standing up" to anything? Am I missing something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Am I missing something?

Yes. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you might have taken the quoted text and the link as being the same thing, when they are 2 separate things.

The X link is a post from X Global Government Affairs regarding this Turkey censorship situation. Some of the text from it:

X received an order to restrict access in Türkiye to the account of the now-detained Mayor of Istanbul. While we have followed Türkiye’s order regarding the account, we strongly disagree with the order and are challenging the order in court. In the spirit of full transparency, we are sharing the court order and our legal filing below.

The order was received from the Turkish Information and Communication Technologies Authority. These orders require X to block content in Türkiye that is available in the rest of the world.

Lack of compliance with these orders can lead to severe sanctions, including throttling of the entire platform in Türkiye. X complied with the court order while we challenge the order in court because we believe keeping the platform accessible in Türkiye is vital to supporting freedom of expression and access to information, particularly following natural disasters and other emergencies.

In the spirit of upholding due process, we carefully review all the requests under the local law. X has been and will continue to object to removal orders including government requests in courts to protect users when those requests do not align with principles of free expression, due process, or other local laws.

Basically the government threatened X to censor that account in Turkey or face severe punishment, like many censorship-happy governments have done lately. X complied but are taking them to court over their order, like they have done with all the other censorship-happy governments who have done the same thing.

BlueSky banned the politicians account there btw. They aren't challenging the order in court.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
  1. How is censoring a politician "standing up for free speech"?
  2. "full of shit" = not a "free speech absolutist". "free speech absolutist" implies that you will not censor any speech no matter what.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.

They issued a legal request to censor his account in Turkey. Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.

X complied with the law and are challenging the censorship request in court, the only place that has the power to overrule the government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You don’t seem to understand how the legal system and governments work.

I am not a lawyer but I do understand how jurisdictions work. Elon is not in theirs.

Failure to do so would result in severe consequences for X, such as having to take X offline for all of Turkey.

If he were a "free speech absolutist" as he claims, he would let them.

You didn't answer my question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Elon isn’t. X is.

I did answer your question. Last paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

X is.

No it is not. Twitter is a US company with US servers. If you want to argue that the US is now a territory of Turkey, please cite a source.

I did answer your question.

No you didn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

X operates in Turkey by giving Turkish users access to the site. They either follow Turkish law or they don’t serve Turkish residents.

They can of course fight any legal requests by the Turkish government - and oh look! They are!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

X restricted Imamoglu’s account in Turkey complying with a legal request by Turkish authorities who cited national security and public order concerns.

Do you know how legal requests work?