this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
346 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17135 readers
1342 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they want the benefits of a highly capitalist society, paying customers, they have to deal with the fallout of a highly capitalist society: a large and unassisted homeless population

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

paying customers

They aren't getting these because of the homeless. The whole area is becoming completely void of businesses and the buildings are completely falling apart. Your argument goes the same for the homeless. If they want the benefits of society they get the good and the bad with it as well.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The argument that the homeless benefit from dog eat dog capitalism and the society that we pretend exists around it is so terrible that you should consider taking a time out from posting for your own mental health.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

no one benefits from dog eat dog capitalism but the most wealthy, homeless people the least

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You get the good and the bad is the previous posters argument. Not mine.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're saying it applies to people who have basically nothing. If you don't understand how ridiculous an argument that is, you should take a moment to consider it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I definitely don't agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You should reread what you are arguing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You should read what you're arguing (perhaps for the first time).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You are wrong. I'm done talking with someone who jumped into someone else's argument and doesn't know what they are even agreeing with.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Ok then someone should hire the homeless to clean up, those business owners could pool their money and offer food and they'd have a nicer area after