this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

71586 readers
6771 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I''m curious about the strong negative feelings towards AI and LLMs. While I don't defend them, I see their usefulness, especially in coding. Is the backlash due to media narratives about AI replacing software engineers? Or is it the theft of training material without attribution? I want to understand why this topic evokes such emotion and why discussions often focus on negativity rather than control, safety, or advancements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Have you talked to any programmers about this? I know several who, in the past 6 months alone, have completely changed their view on exactly how effective AI is in automating parts of their coding. Not only are they using it, they are paying to use it because it gives them a personal return on investment...but you know, you can keep using that push lawnmower, just don't complain when the kids next door run circles around you at a quarter the cost.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Automating parts of something as a reference tool is a WILDLY different thing than differing to AI to finalize your code, which will be shitcode.

Anybody right now who is programming that is letting AI code out there is bad at their job.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

No argument there.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Have you had to code review someone who is obviously just committing AI bullshit? It is an incredible waste of time. I know people who learned pre-LLM (i.e. have functioning brains) and are practically on the verge of complete apathy from having to babysit ai code/coders, especially as their management keeps pushing people to use it. As in, they must use LLM as a performance metric.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

but you know, you can keep using that push lawnmower, just don’t complain when the kids next door run circles around you at a quarter the cost.

That push lawnmower will still mow the lawn in decades to come though, while your kids fancy high-tech lawnmower will explode in a few months and you're lucky if it doesn't burn the entire house down with it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

congratulations on offloading your critical thinking skills to a chatbot that you most likely don't own. what are you gonna do when the bubble is over, or when dc with it burns down