1853
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

But is the information wrong?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

No, the information is correct from what I can determine. But it would have taken me a lot longer to find the relevant sections of law and precedent and sift through them on my own.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They're all mercifully short reads (at least enough to get the idea if they apply) and famous enough to be easy to find. I just went through them in a higher-level post. They're all right-ish. 3 are solid, the other 3 are technically accurate, but there's enough wiggle room to get out of it.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I edited my post with some relevant citations and links

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

At my work I have some serious privacy and security questions about what people are pasting into chatgpt.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
1853 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7732 readers
425 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS