politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
To bad. Money talks. Huge advantage. Take what we can get. It's immoral to make terrible strategic choices when the consequences of losing is letting Nazi 2.0 take power.
Just make the deal where he has to fund a small Navy to send aid to Palestine.
So the solution to defeat Nazi 2.0 is to cater to Nazi 2.1?
We have the technology to make it better, stronger, and faster!
Yea if they pay up
Go to bed with a Nazi you wake up a Nazi.
You're a Nazi regardless if you believe that. But also no doesn't work like that. That's a pretty dramatic take. He's a drugged out idiot. His salute bullshit was trolling at the worst. Let him fund things. You don't need to invite him into your house for a beer. The actual Nazis are in government right now in key positions hiring strategically. We're so far up shits Creek. It's just like any of you fucking people are funding anything on the left.
How about we just tax him instead of acting like quislings?
You're not giving him anything. He's paying. How does that make you the quisling. If you're using WWII knowledge. That was is fillled with examples of strategy over some made up head up our ass moral superiority. Take advantage especially capital in a capitalist world. Especially a capitalist with massive signal boosting capabilities. Tired of fucking losing with you people.
This is the most neolib response I've ever read.
The fucking world is burning and I partially blame the left for ineffective and incompetent strategies and ideals. In my life, the left has a decent hold on things. Every year things improved bit by bit. But then the Internet came and it became clearer and clearer things changed. Instead of adsorption adapting the left just lost and continued to lose and never once has been critical of why they have been losing. It's always how others are just dumb or rich.
So you want to double down on neoliberalism, which is mainly the reason why Dems keep losing? You're as much as a genius as Musk.
Lol they're not losing because of neoliberalism. They're losing because the left is no longer effective as a group and Democrats are closer to Republicans but that's only because they're allowed to be by the people. Which goes back to the left as people are just ineffective at what they try to accomplish.
And by kowtowing to Musk, you're going to get much more of the same thing. Again, doubling down on Neoliberalism is what's going to make Dems lose. Like how the fuck are you not getting this? You sound like Schumer and Co.
Where did I say kowtowing.
Good job on ignoring everything else and hyperfixating on one word. You're not a serious person. You can kindly fuck off now.
That's a critical part of the argument
You seem to be mistaking the Democrats for "the left" when they are in fact a party of right-wing moderates.
I'd advise looking up Douglas McCarthy for some historical perspective on why there is no "left wing" in American politics.
No I'm not. You people are like lemmings. One of you says a thing and then that's like your go to retort. Need like a David Attenborough for the digital age that can see these copy paste retorts in the wild and categorize them all.
I'm well aware they're not the left. But I'm a political climate where there's Republicans and Democrats you don't have many options.
If someone tries to you into a false dichotomy, the correct move is to call them out.
If you want to comply with a political party that you yourself said "sucks", that's your perogative. I'll be over here with everyone else whom the Democrats have failed to represent.
Well maybe that is the reason both political parties have moved further and further to the right
The reason they're both moving to the right is that they are both right-wing parties, beholden to the same capitalist interests.
That's what a lot of you keep telling yourselves to self soothe all the failures
There's always excuses. But the fact is the left lost the plot a long time ago.
Hey, here is another example. The left can't ever set it self up for success. Chase all the money and power away. Then wonder why there's been a steady decline.
https://lemmy.world/post/31156021
Your logic doesn't explain why that trend has persisted since these two parties were founded. Much easier just to wave the whole issue away by blaming the people who aren't represented by the two-party system, right? They should change their politics to match the party and not the other way around, right?
Depends, is he going to put out a press release and leverage his "donation" to whitewash his reputation or is it going to be anonymous and with no strings attached?
That's on us and the Democrats. The Democrats probably will but who cares, they're fucking garbage anyways. Are you about to suck him off or anyone else? Probably not.
But does he want in and can fund lots of shit. Fuck yea he can. Operation paperclip his ass. Bring him in. Have him donate to Harvard, fund some Mercs to get aid into Palestine. Hell he is a troll, have him buy all the properties around Trump's properties and build them higher than his. Who fucking cares. Capital is good. Capital does things. We've already lost everything. Take the W when we can.
Nah, IMO the Democrats are shitty enough as it is without the world's richest zit getting involved.
Yea they suck. And he is a zit. But also rich.
Being rich makes all of his motives and desires suspect, if he told me the sky was blue then I'd assume he pulled some kind of Lex Luthor shit and turned it purple and green until I could check for myself.
That's not the kind of person we want running the country. In fact, that is the kind of person who should be kept very far away from the political process except when it's investigating reports of malfeasance at his companies.
WW2 reference? Or WWZ reference?
The former. I read WWZ but never watched the movie or played the game.
Imagine being so stupid you can't differentiate a nazi from a nazi. Good thing you're not in politics, champ.
The problem is that if he funds things he's going to trying to influence things to go to the right. He hates "woke", believes white genocide is a threat, believes in suppression of free speech, hates regulation, etc..
I don't think he believes any of those things. He's a capitalist. He doesn't care because those are rules. Rules do not apply to the rich like him. They're just pieces on a game board they move around. He wants attention. Take advantage. Convince him to aid Palestine and they'll all be eating cyber trucks in a week.
He absolutely believes in those things, and has shown multiple times he's willing to light his money on fire to support his ideals. He's idealistic (adjacent to the neo-fascist Dark Enlightenment movement), and not just simply motivated by wealth.
As a believer of white genocide there's no way we can convince him to aid Palestine. Supporting Ukraine again, maybe.
I think guys like him can be convinced to action with some very petty motivations. But we just need methods to motivate
Hand waving a hand wave.. I did Nazi that coming.
Don't care end of the day. The way you all get wrapped up over shit that doesn't matter is crazy. The guy is trying to be 4chan irl. You people call everybody Nazis. He's just a troll. He doesn't have enough moral conviction to be a Nazi. He's just a drug addict
None of that is a good look for Democrats.
Elon isn't a democrat
The article is akout whether the Democratic Party should try to "win" Elon back.
Its bad strategy and the thing that Democrats really need to learn right now: Money doesn't win elections.
3x+ fundraising for Harris. Loss.
Musk drops millions on judicial race. Loss.
People win elections. You are just wrong about money.
Money doesn't win elections alone. But it's like 90% of what it takes to win. A politician spends most of their year canvassing for funds. That is why Washington is majority call centers for these politicians. Look it up. It has the most call centers per capita because they all cold call donors for funding.
The left needs content. Content creators need funding. People don't win elections. Money wins elections. If money didn't win elections, the deliverables Democrats would have a higher success rate. The left is circling the drain. It's not the 1900s anymore. A political group made up of poor angry young people isn't going to be able to punch as hard against the authoritarian forces that exist today. You can't just freak out and burn cities. You need subversion and better strategy. It all costs money. The left on all fronts has lost. There's no coming back especially with the awareness some of them have. They do the same thing every year and act like it'll work while also crying about how bad it's become. But it's never them it's always the mean rich people. Well maybe being rich has something to do with their success and victories over the past could decades.
in the 2024 election the RNC raised 390 million, dems raised 548 million. Dems still lost. The old consultant wisdom that whoever raises the most money wins no matter what didnt work.
That's crazy I didn't know that. But I think of funding. I think of funding grifters like heritage foundation, TPUSA, people's careers like Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Tim Pool whoever amplifies.
There's not much on the left. Unless it's a former Republican who is now anti Trump.