this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
1357 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7599 readers
118 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago (41 children)

Exactly which nuance is important in this context?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

You see, when some motherfucker you don't know wants to fuck your girl, that's BAD! When it's ya homies, it's chill.

Life lessonWomen are human beings that should have autonomy to do as they please. And they're not "yours" or anybody else's but their own selves. (Women, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Women are human beings that should have autonomy to do as they please.

This is 100% true, for anyone (obviously excepting it doesn't infringe on others, such as murder for example), but also its okay for people to have boundaries and for you to compromise within those boundaries, assuming you want to be with the person more than you care about the boundary they have.

Now whether such a thing should be a boundary is another question, but if it's normal to, for example, not want your partner to cheat and have that as a boundary, we can at least agree its okay for boundaries to exist at all within a relationship, and that it isn't necessarily infringing on your autonomy as a person for your partner to have them.

There are however definitely boundaries that should be considered a red flag, and for many people this may be one of them. That's fine, and it's fully your choice to decide whether you accept a boundary, just as some people may only want an open relationship, and so "no 'cheating' of any form" would be a boundary they wouldn't accept, despite being common.

And they're not "yours" or anybody else's but their own selves.

Fully agree.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

not want your partner to cheat

IMO cheating is by definition something your partner does not want. Defining cheating as a certain set of actions that everyone agrees on independent of the relationship is a dead end. If you instead define cheating as "knowingly violating your partner's boundaries" (and make sure to talk about those boundaries!), everything becomes so much easier

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)