this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
1227 points (100.0% liked)

You Should Know

39226 readers
67 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for completely ignoring my analysis of the sources of your "have you seen this, you filthy commie?" article. Kinda proving that you're arguing from vibes here and not from material evidence.

Has anyone spoken to him afterwards? No? Why's that?

Because he's an anonymous dude only known from a low-res video that absolutely doesn't allow for identification?

Massacres outside the square don't count

You're being purposefully obtuse. I explicitly said that the degree of repression was probably overboard and unnecessary, and a dark episode in Chinese history. You're literally ignoring my reasonable points and arguing against strawmans, while refusing to do the bare minimum analysis of the sources of your material

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I explicitly said that the degree of repression was probably overboard and unnecessary, and a dark episode in Chinese history.

Yet, here you are, completely triggered and feeling the need to argue and bending over backwards to defend China over a single picture of a lego figurine that I posted.

You could have just agreed that using tanks against protestors is indeed Very Bad™, like a normal fucking person. So yeah, of course I'm going to ridicule you, you daft cunt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

feeling the need to argue and bending over backwards to defend China

Mate, you brought up the topic, not me. I initially started a conversation on precisely the picture you posted, because most people in the west see it out of context and believe that the protestor was trampled or arrested, instead of harmlessly walking away. You're the one spreading anti-china propaganda and, when confronted with the reality of the specific picture you sent, you deflect and send an article with 100 pictures of the event.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is an iconic picture that is representative for the courage of the people protesting, as well as for the bloody repression that occurred. Tanks were used against protestors, and not even the Chinese government denies that hundreds of people lost their lives on that day.

You feeling the need to "correct" me on tankman, just makes you an ackshually-ing neckbeard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is an iconic picture

If by "iconic picture" you mean "out-of-context, manipulative, anticommunist, CIA-sponsored atrocity propaganda", then yes, it's very iconic in the NATO countries (show this to a Latin American and see if they know what it is).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

out-of-context, manipulative, anticommunist, CIA-sponsored atrocity propaganda

Oh my god 😂 How do you even come up with shit like that? Do you have it rehearsed so that it just roll off your tongue?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nah, it just happens when you actually research a topic and critically examine the events and the sources, instead of uncritically swallowing propaganda based on a single source of politicians from TERF-Island, sorry I mean Great Britain,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That must be so tiring, continuously rationalizing away the cognitive dissonance as "propaganda" and "CIA conspiracy" whenever you come across facts that don't align with your world view.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude, literally, please, go to my original comment detailing the sources of your article, and answer on a point by point basis what's wrong about my comments on the SPECIFIC sources of YOUR OWN ARTICLE.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I'm not following you on a death-by-nitpicking quest. How is anyone even supposed to argue with logic such as "reee your source is a politician from TERF-island so this isn't true!" ...

In any case, none of your held beliefs meaningfully change anything about what happened: a mass protest was brutally repressed by an authoritarian regime, many innocent people died. End of story. No CIA conspiracy, no sinophobia, no propaganda, just something terrible that happened in this terrible world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

"No, I won't engage in the critical analysis of my sources. My view on this heavily politically charged historical event is definitely not influenced by western bias, and even if it was, it doesn't matter, because constantly unpromptedly bringing up something that happened 36 years ago isn't political, it's just a fact."