this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
Explain Like I'm Five
17358 readers
1 users here now
Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They are over 83% at this point
https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/analysis-of-iaea-iran-verification-and-monitoring-report-may-2025/
Not according to the IAEA unless you have a more up to date source than May.
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2025/6/19/what-is-irans-fordow-nuclear-facility-and-could-us-weapons-destroy-it
This was the article talking about IAEA finding particles at over 83%
Good reason to be suspect but I don't know if it's enough to claim they are enriching to that level.
There isn’t really any reason to enrich to 60% if you aren’t going for weapons grade, 20% HALEU fuel is the highest breakeven I know of where the benefit to enrich to 20% can in certain reactors outweigh the cost of enrichment but even then 20% is considered uncommonly high for most power plants 60% is just another beast with a hugely added cost
Yes, but they pinky swear that one batch was a mistake. /s