this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1427 points (100.0% liked)

Bluesky

1388 readers
5 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Stalin took the Russian state from an agricultural backwater to a Space Age superpower in a matter of twenty years.

If he'd started out a Virginia plantation owner instead of a Georgian bank robber, capitalists would have loved him. He'd be bigger than Churchill.

American liberals love (the whitewashed version of) FDR because they see the quasi-socialism of the mid-20th century as the morally correct path. Eastern Europeans - who came through two world wars and repeated genocides on every front - have a lot more of an appetite for Iron Fisted Dictator[Communist] after enduring generations of Iron Fisted Dictator[Monarchist]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But the way in which he did it was very costly. Stalin is comparable to Musk in that sense. In love with technology and factories, but too focussed on advancement no matter the human cost. Everything was about efficiency.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Stalin is comparable to Musk in that sense.

Christ. Musk is, if anything, more comparable to Henry Ford.

Billionaire car magnet with whole municipal governments in his pocket who wrecked public transit and spread antisemitism all over Europe? That's not the editor and chief at Pravda.

If you were to put Stalin anywhere in contemporary US politics, I'd say he's comparable to Shyam Sankar - the Palantir CTO who was recently granted the rank of Lt. Colonel in the US military. Or, perhaps, just straight up comparing him to Peter Thiel minus all the buggery.

In love with technology and factories, but too focussed on advancement no matter the human cost. Everything was about efficiency.

Silicon Valley has swarms of these guys. Most of them aren't constantly pissing themselves from too much Ketamine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If he hadn't been, would the USSR survived? That focus on technology, factories, and efficiency, no matter the cost, seems like the right approach when there's Nazis at your doorstep, conquering all of Europe and conducting mass exterminations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nothing says "preparing for war against the Nazis and capitalists" like murdering your entire officer corps of true believers that won the Revolution that you didn't actually fight in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Anything's possible when you make shit up kiddo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I probably will, reality is extremely fucked up in entirely fixable ways but there's no indication they'll be fixed in my lifetime because they're all profitable for someone, if you're not mad you're either stupid or evil

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Ussr survived thanks to allied aid and got to go on conquering all of europe and conducting mass extermination while putting other mass murderers in power who went on to cause some of the largest and most sadisic mass murders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Anything's possible when you make shit up kiddo

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

When did the USSR conduct "mass exterminations?"

The largest and most sadistic mass murders were by the Nazis, obviously. Are you trying to downplay the Holocaust?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

That's about what I expected lmao.