this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
1071 points (100.0% liked)
Political Humor
1252 readers
517 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The democratic governor, for instance, has said she won't fund Mamdani's programs.
That's fine because Mamdani isn't asking for state funding, AFAIK. His $60M grocery store plan reallocates funding which would have gone to business subsidies for grocery stores, his other ideas cost an estimated $3M and $5M out of a $116Bn fiscal budget. Since Property Taxes are not handled by the state he doesn't need permission to raise them on.
Making buses free might actually save them money from investigating unpaid tickets.
I would love what you're saying to be true, but I don't think it is:
I'm not sure how trustworthy that article is, since it also claims Cuomo comfortably won Brooklyn but the results for Brooklyn were Mamdani 48% to Cuomo 31%. Property taxes do not require state congress and the NYC budget is also separate from the state treasury. It does mention 3 dissenting state congressmen out of 150, the party breakdown being 83D 22R 45O.
More sources on the Albany point:
WJS:
Obvious Bias aside for a moment, it doesn't really explain why and it also sort of defeats the initial point you were making by implying Mamandi has overwhelming support by the state congress. I'm not going to sit here and "read more theory" that you keep pulling out when you can't even say in your own words why Mamdani needs permission from Albany or the governor.
I never implied that...? And this isn't theory, these are news and opinion articles. I'm tired of your sealioning though, bye!
The article doesn't say that. This is what it says:
You're not doing the bare minimum to arrive at an accurate picture of things. This makes this discussion a waste of time.
For anyone who's actually curious, this map shows the results for each election district.