1084
the ratchet is angry
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
1084 points (100.0% liked)
Political Humor
1290 readers
260 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Toothless neolibs and neocons aren’t leftist, this is not an opinion, learn to operate outside of the U.S.’s Overton window.
"Toothless" says the one who does nothing but throw insults in the face of an argument.
Where did i insult you?
lmao
You're insulting the DNC. You haven't cited a single policy or vote or even quoted any statements out of context, you're basically just trolling instead of any good faith attempt to turn anyone over to your side.
Meanwhile, someone provides sources and you refused to read them. It looks like you just refuse to listen to anyone that doesn't agree with you.
Yeah, that's what sources are for, vetting information. If your source is unreliable then you get called out for it.
That's not "calling out unreliable sources", that's saying "any source you provide I'm not going to read".
Whats the matter, you hit your word limit and couldn't finish quoting?
I'll remind you we are currently in the thread where someone was "saying in their own words" and that wasn't good enough for you either.
Yeah, they couldn't say why, provide any evidence of their claim and neither could their articles, but I'm supposed to accept the claim as fact? I'm just supposed to sit down and read 6 articles which would print to like 80 pages and then accept their unsubstantial claims as fact for no reason but the sheer number of words placed in front of me? That's really dumb, anon.
Can you direct me to any of your posts here that provide evidence for your claims?
Yes, check the comments above which made claims.
I went up this thread and didn't see any links. Not interested in searching your entire post history.
Lmao
I accept your resignation from the argument, better luck next time.
Did you make a point to argue? It looks to me like you admitted you can't even figure out what my statement was. Do you want me to argue that you did understand and pretended not to? Why would I?
Sorry, as per your own rules you already resigned from the argument.
Calling a spade a spade is not an insult to the spade.