Books

6046 readers

149 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
No spam. All posts should be related to books.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Dual opposing opinions on books? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Maybe a strange question, but do you often have simultaneous opposing opinions on books or series that you read?

Not too long ago I read Peter Watts' Blindsight, and it has many thought-provoking ideas about conscience, the human brain, and alien life. Yet it is wrapped in a mediocre sci-fi action movie script that is difficult to follow and stops making sense toward the end. So I cannot say that I exactly liked or disliked it.

And just now, I finished Ann Leckie's Imperial Radch series, and it feels like books 2 and 3 (Ancillary Sword, Ancillary Mercy) are entirely separate story from book 1 (Ancillary Justice). The latter books are okay for what they are, but do not live up to the style, scale, and pace of the first book, and leave some of the concepts entirely unexplored. So once again, I cannot exactly say that I loved the series.

Any other books that left you with similar dual opinions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I hated every minute of reading it, but I'm glad I read Gravity's Rainbow. I'm still not entirely sure I know what happened through most of the book, nor the point of the book, but my overall feeling of the book is positive.

I enjoyed reading Confederacy of Dunces until I just couldn't read anymore so I stopped mid-book. The main character was so unlikeable (on purpose) and story so disjointed with no apparent plot, that while I started out enjoying it as a fun story, I eventually became disinterested and hated the book without finishing it.

I absolutely loved Name of the Wind when I read it 63 years ago and told so many people about it. I could overlook its pretty glaring faults because I just loved the way it was written and the world that was created. I kinda hate the book now because A) the follow up book was mostly awful with some great parts mixed in, and B) the author doesn't seem to be interested in finishing the series and is an asshole to the fans who want the series finished.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

My AP Lit teacher said Gravity's Rainbow was the most difficult book he ever read, and he highly recommended it. I'm terrified to try and tackle it, but I hope to do so one day. I'm going to focus first on some classics after I'm done with my current book.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

The thing is, it's not difficult to read like Ulysses or Sound and Fury. It's like reading a firsthand account of an acid trip during WWII as it is happening, sometimes slipping into stream of consciousness but not always?? With some aerospace engineering mixed in??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's interesting about Gravity's Rainbow.

I had the exact opposite reading Cryptonomicon: it was not bad and sometimes rather interesting to read, but looking back, it was 900 pages of wannabe hackers and WWII dudes, tied together with barely 100 pages worth of plot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I have the same opinion as you of Cryptonomicon. It was... fine? Maybe if I had read it 25 years ago my opinion would have been different, but reading it now it just felt old-timey and uninteresting.