1478
Seems like the most reasonable explanation
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1478 points (100.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
7644 readers
228 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It would have caused international scandals too. I think they had to cover it up… anything to save face of the leadership/the .01%
The leaderships face is not being saved. Epstein was an intelligence honeypot.
It's known that he and Maxwell would traffic minors to get incriminating video on people so they would become assets of multiple intelligence agencies.
That is suspected. Can you link to anything that increases the certainty?
Not because I'm being a dick, but because evidence would be interesting and useful.
It's more of an open secret.
So no then?
The abusers are being saved. They’re Epstein and his clients, who happen to be at the top of the food chain.
Think about who is saving the abusers.
It's not a food chain. It's about power.