this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

3113 readers
23 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/22505617

It seems that the dev burned out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I hope I'm wrong, but I'm worried the next wave might make Lemmy even worse than Reddit in this aspect.

Lemmy encourages politicisation. It's generally a good thing, but politics raise the stakes of everything, so being political and irrational is way worse than being unengaged and irrational.

What would happen if you get an influx of people from a platform that actively encourages irrationality, landing into one where a huge amount of people are politicised? A: newcomers who were "eating crayons" in Reddit are given a box with 48 huge crayons, and competing to see which one eats them the fastest.

I genuinely hate karma, I think it encourages mindlessly posting common denominator stuff, but I wouldn't be opposed to that if handled like Slashdot handles it - it doesn't give you a karma number, it only tells you your karma is "good" or "bad".

Lemmy was only ever going to work as a tiny forum board - it simply refuses to grow.

I feel like part of that is scope: Lemmy as a software is trying too hard to be "federated Reddit", filling the exact same niche as Reddit, to the point advertising Lemmy means "to make it appealing for Reddit users". And, in the process, losing access to potential new userbases.

Think on it this way: most of what we do here is to discuss things. Like in Reddit and in forums, but also in comment sections of random sites. Why isn't Lemmy trying to capitalise on that, and eat a chunk of Disqus' pie too? Fuck, we could have Lemmy built into the discussion sections for random wikis out there. (And if not Lemmy, at least some ActivityPub software that integrates really well with Lemmy.) It would be an amazing way to bring in new fresh blood without it being necessarily from that shithole, or social media platforms in general.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I genuinely hate karma, I think it encourages mindlessly posting common denominator stuff, but I wouldn’t be opposed to that if handled like Slashdot handles it - it doesn’t give you a karma number, it only tells you your karma is “good” or “bad”.

Same here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I have virtually given up on having "logical" conversations on Lemmy. Admiral Patrick and you represent roughly half of the list of people that I still trust that I can do that with. The amount of "witch hunting" and "purity testing" - as the meme goes - is too damn high!!!

I can agree with someone 99% of the way, but if I forget myself and say just ONE thing different - like I prefer Unix but not Linux, or maybe Linux but not Arch? - then it's all APOSTASY!!!

image

I cannot remember the last time that I downvoted someone. But people were even downvoting Admiral Patrick (the dev of Tesseract) for posting his goodbye message - get this - in his own community, housed on his own instance. I commented there in an Edit, how on earth is that kind of message "less relevant" (the purpose behind a downvote) in such a community?

When I look around, I mostly see just kids vomiting up their emotions. Which... I shitpost too damnit! But I also like to close the door and have a place to have a more sedate discussion with people who are interested and have actually thought for one second about a topic prior to speaking. It is not that I am against the PRESENCE of the former, but rather than I am adamant that the ABSENCE of even so much as the capability to allow for the latter that is killing Lemmy, day by day.

But that's less of a "Reddit" problem imho and more of a "Lemmy was made by authoritarian devs who prefer to admin their own instance the the desires of the rest of the world to use the software differently than that are kinda their own problem, not that of the devs?" Which makes perfect sense. And encourages me leave Lemmy.

Which I did - PieFed is fantastic:-). Although a lot of the "content" is still on Lemmy, and thus subject to Lemmy moderation rules, which involve a ton of human volunteer curation effort, even as the mod gets spit upon for not being pure enough.

I too think that karma can be useful if done sparingly - e.g. if someone has "enough" karma to post in certain, more thoughtful communities, but beyond that threshold count it means nothing. Much like there are rooms for toddlers to play in, rooms for adolescents, and ostensibly rooms for "adults" as well... although when kids are allowed to enter and scream as loud as they can to their hearts content, doesn't it REALLY become a room for kids, or at least mixed ages? The threshold limiter is the only thing I can think of that would allow for it to be quiet. Either that or kick the loudest, screamiest (hehe that's not a word as we both know:-P) kid out after they've already screamed... except we do not do that, and this place allowing for total anonymity means that they simply slip right back in nearly instantly after being kicked out. Which is why Admiral Patrick said that he left: as lemm.ee shut down, all the trolls went elsewhere and somehow forgot to helpfully label themselves with the same account name as they had on lemm.ee, forcing him to have to start all over again... or just leave the Threadiverse entirely:-(.

Yes, Lemmy is Reddit 2.0, somehow even more authoritarian than even Reddit was. Like we've replaced spez with dessalines: instead of one person saying what we can and cannot criticize we have someone else disallowing any criticism of Russia, China, or North Korea... tbf we also have our choice of other admins as well, or if we are willing to pay the electricity, network traffic, time, skill, and attention costs (especially for being mindful of CSAM attacks), ourselves, but the latter seem to be very few, especially as the Threadiverse grows in size and scope and traffic.

PieFed solves much of that, but it is still new and so trades one set of problems with a different set.

Why aren't people trying to do something about it? Because there is only so much that mods and even admins CAN do, while still on the Lemmy software. People kept waiting for a better replacement: Kbin.social provided a strong hope but then it died, and Mbin another but it seems to have stalled and is not everyone's cup of tea, then there was Sublinks that seemed to offer promise but it too stalled as the dev had a baby - see e.g. this post where the admins of Lemmy.World expressed strong hope in it. And now finally we have PieFed, which finally FULFILLS all of those hopes and dreams!! Maybe. At least it exists, and it has tons of features, and so now also piefed.world has been created as well, as a test. So... perhaps this will open up what you are talking about?

It will take effort though: mods will have to learn how to set up and use the automated tools. I imagine therefore that a few mods will end up automating the moderation of many many communities at once, even more so than on Lemmy. But once it is automated... it can scale as large as desired?

But "Lemmy" itself does not care about growing, as you have already seen. Pop over to lemmy.ml and look at some of the conversations happening on Local: they want to remain their echo chamber, disconnected from centrists from the Western world? (edit: there are oh so many spelling mistakes in this comment, but I am going to ignore all of those and yet still want to clarify this one point: I know you are a leftist, and at one point I thought I was too, but compared to the likes of hexbear and lemmygrad.ml and even lemmy.ml we are flaming right-wingers, I believe? if you [checks notes] "have a bank account", then you aren't leftist enough for them). Which is fine - we'll go make our own spaces, as we have already started and are in the process of doing just this past month, especially as lemm.ee went down and many MANY communities migrated not to another Lemmy server but to a PieFed one, plus several new ones were created. Speaking of brace yourself, but a good third or more of Lemmy traffic might also shift over to PieFed, especially if Lemmy.World decides to shut down, like if the admins prefer to keep their focus on only one piece of software, and the mods give up having to deal with all the toxicity without having access to the automated tools (as Admiral Patrick finally did). But more likely it will be a graduated shift, punctuated by fits and starts in response to various stimuli.

The answer remains the same as always: if you build it they will come (and conversely you HAVE to build it or else they will not), but the interpretation of that hits differently after this past month of migrations to PieFed, because the pace of that building process seems to have quickened! (or in reality it merely has entered a phase where the growth is more visible to us using common metrics, such as Monthly Active Users, rather than more intangible ones such as GitHub commits of a variety of software features)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I know you are a leftist, and at one point I thought I was too, but compared to the likes of hexbear and lemmygrad.ml and even lemmy.ml we are flaming right-wingers, I believe? if you [checks notes] “have a bank account”, then you aren’t leftist enough for them).

I promise you I have a bank account. I'm an anarchist and I prefer .ml because I don't care about opposing "campism". (not a real thing)

I'm more on the intersection of anarchism and Luxemburgism; I share a lot of her criticism of the USSR and I find Marxists often end up agreeing with me. At the end of the day I oppose inter-capitalist wars and support revolutionary organizing against the existing system. That alone is enough to put me on the bad side of most of lib Lemmy.

A divide like this happened among anarchists in the first world war too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

The thing with campism is, that it's a trap: you're walking through a path you need to, doing steps towards what you believe to be the right direction, then you step on the trap. And when you notice "fuck, I'm trapped!", it's already too late - you're inside.

For some Marxists, I think it's multiple levels of mistaking the means for the end, and making the means the new end:

1. We need freedom, peace and human dignity...
2. so we need the fruits or our labour...
3. so we need a stateless society...
4. so we need a transitory state to reach communism...
5. so we need to defend that transitory state, as well as associated ideologies...
6a. so we need to fight against NATO...
7a. so we need to ally ourselves to NATO's enemies...
8a. so we need to defend our allies against threats...
9a. so we need to shield our allies against criticism.\

Each of that steps, when taken in isolation, is rational. However if you follow all of them, you end in campism - defending things like Czar Putler's Russia and its invasion of Ukraine, even if Putin himself is shitting on human dignity, freedom and peace (and that's literally our goal!). I see things like this all the time while lurking in Hexbear, and specially from Hexbear members outside their instance. Some might say "no, I'm just doing critical support!", but, well... we know it's already way past critical support.

Interesting to note the same ones doing this sort of campism see no problem with something like this:

5. (same as above) so we need to defend that transitory state, as well as associated ideologies...
6b. so we need to remain united...
7b. so we need to denounce any group breaking off the unity.

That's the part they start shitting on you anarchists, or us Trotskyists.

A divide like this happened among anarchists in the first world war too.

The ghost of that second international will still haunt us for a long time...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Remember that Alt Right Playbook video about the Ship of Theseus? That's the sort of oversimplification you see both in witch hunts and in purity testing: A is almost identical to B, B to C, [...], X to Y, Y to Z, so people oversimplify it as "A is equal to Z". So if A is bad, Z is equally bad: not worse, not better, there's only "bad" and "good".

And as the video shows, it's in almost every social media platform. Plus in Reddit; I think people simply brought this into a more politicised platform, but it's the same irrationality. It is a Reddit (and Twitter, Tumblr, FB, and now Lemmy) problem.

Then you get the .ml admin team* nurturing a politicised platform; that's great but it* never nurtured the rationality necessary to employ that politicisation well. Perhaps on purpose, or perhaps because they didn't notice the need, dunno.

So, they let that Reddit problem in, and much like an invasive species, it's hard to get rid of it after some time goes by. And I do blame the .ml admin team for the situation, like you do, but for a different reason.

Additionally, I also blame the .world admin team*; unlike the .ml it chased growth instead of politicisation, but still no rationality.

*note I'm assigning the blame to the entities. It's messier to blame the individuals, as we never know their full history. Plus humans gotta be flawed.

Thankfully Rimu seems to be well aware of the problem, based on the sidebar of PieFed's main instance.

one point: I know you are a leftist, and at one point I thought I was too, but compared to the likes of hexbear and lemmygrad.ml and even lemmy.ml we are flaming right-wingers, I believe? if you [checks notes] “have a bank account”, then you aren’t leftist enough for them

I'm not sure, but I think they consider me worse than a right-winger: in their minds I'm probably a weird mix of Trotskyist with anarchist, two groups they dislike because neither plays well with their "left unity" campist trap. If that's correct it's hilarious, because it's pretty much accurate!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That is very interesting point. For me, judgement is "work" and comes at the end, after gathering facts, whereas for some they seem to take shortcuts to rush directly to that part. Proper judgement of matters - as we see in fields such as science, medicine, engineering, mathematics, education (STEM), as well as law, history, especially philosophy (liberal arts) - is difficult and not to be joked around about. So perhaps discussion of such is entirely incompatible with... not quite "the internet" bc that is simply a tool to be used however we please, but rather with "social media" (as you brought up).

Although (even here I cannot allow myself to rush to judgement in order to say that!? 😜) perhaps that is an oversimplification since we all can fall prey to biases in our thinking at some point along our chain of thinking. It is just that some people actually seem to care about that while others not so much; read that as in: not at all. And ofc some think in manners that are diametrically opposed, not as in a 180 reversal but tangential as in truth serves the end of emotional gratification combined with might makes right hence authoritarianism, e.g. "I don't like what I see and since I have that power I will downvote it" - but not bc it deserves to be thus, and instead bc it feels good to do so.

So now I will judge the ml admin team - although with the major caveats that they are 100% free to do as they please, and that I support large portions of their work as well as the process by which they went about it: they absolutely dared to be the change that they wanted to see in the world, and the highly successful Lemmy is the result of that. Also... it is always much easier to criticize rather than create. All that said, two wrongs do not make a right: discarding some of "Reddit" while keeping other parts of it are not to my tastes, and will lead to Lemmy ultimately being unsuccessful in the Western world. Which they are aware of, and actively okay with: they made Lemmy for themselves, not others. I do not entirely respect people who use alternative facts, though I respect them as developers infinitely more than their followers who don't question anything and simply make fun of Western society bc of groupthink, exactly like Hexbear just less extreme, so like in kind if not to the same degree. (And I am entirely ignoring all of leftist philosophy itself since we've discussed it before - everything here is completely ignoring content and focusing solely on process.)

And I think differently about the .world admin team: they have a hard job, but they are doing it? Not halting entirely but pausing discussion of jury nullification for like - what was it? - 3 days while they consult their legal standing seems entirely different to me. Also defederating from Hexbear I actually agree with. Most of what the trolls seem to blame them for I end up siding with the reasonable-seeming (to me?) LW admins rather than the complainers. I might be ignorant here: is there something huge that I am missing where the LW admins are somehow acting like the ML team? I'm legit not seeing it - I know people claim that but I do not know why?

Both end up censoring and removing stuff, but the difference is that LW is transparent from the beginning about precisely what that is - leaving people free to move to another instance if that is what they prefer - whereas the ML is disingenuous in claiming to be purely an instance focusing on FOSS and privacy, leaving people having to find out the hard way the actual facts of the situation. In essence they refuse to have consideration that some other side to the topic even so much as exists, much less deserves to be mentioned or explained what their stance is about - "Russia is (apparently?) awesome" and they will brook no dispute about that, on pain of instance-wide banning, but nowhere do they ever actually SAY that (that I have seen, and I spent hours looking).

As for leftist, I no longer feel comfortable discussing in too much depth my own thoughts (I live in the USA and could literally end up in a concentration camp for even misperceptions about such), but I will say that the most hated groups by authoritarians tend to be the "with me but not as with me as I would hope" camps. Purity testing will continue until morale improves, smdh 😞.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Although (even here I cannot allow myself to rush to judgement in order to say that!? 😜) perhaps that is an oversimplification since we all can fall prey to biases in our thinking at some point along our chain of thinking. It is just that some people actually seem to care about that while others not so much; read that as in: not at all.

Exactly. Some details will be always missing; but a good person is supposed at least looks for them, instead of actively trying to shove them under the rug so they reach some dichotomic "us vs. them" view of the world.

[.ml vs. .world admin teams]

I do agree .ml is way worse when it comes to transparency; for example, they see no problem on labelling criticism against the Russian government as "bigotry". It's still far from ideal in .world's case; for example, when the topic is Palestine.

And people might say "well, those are local mods, not the admin team", but IMO the admin team should be partially responsible for what mods do.

As for leftist, I no longer feel comfortable discussing [...]

No worries - I get it. I didn't tell you my whole political instance either, for the same reason - if I were to say everything I think about politics in Lemmy, I'd get the federal cops giving me a visit.