Books

6068 readers

76 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
No spam. All posts should be related to books.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Dual opposing opinions on books? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Maybe a strange question, but do you often have simultaneous opposing opinions on books or series that you read?

Not too long ago I read Peter Watts' Blindsight, and it has many thought-provoking ideas about conscience, the human brain, and alien life. Yet it is wrapped in a mediocre sci-fi action movie script that is difficult to follow and stops making sense toward the end. So I cannot say that I exactly liked or disliked it.

And just now, I finished Ann Leckie's Imperial Radch series, and it feels like books 2 and 3 (Ancillary Sword, Ancillary Mercy) are entirely separate story from book 1 (Ancillary Justice). The latter books are okay for what they are, but do not live up to the style, scale, and pace of the first book, and leave some of the concepts entirely unexplored. So once again, I cannot exactly say that I loved the series.

Any other books that left you with similar dual opinions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Had the exact same thoughts about Blindsight. I got Watts' second book in that series and didn't even make it halfway. I think you described it well how Watt's seems to have profound topics to discuss, but drapes it in some bizarre sci-fi/fantasy trope-filled amalgamation. I can't think of another one I've felt that way about, but you've posed an interesting question for sure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Another one that comes to mind is Red Rising, but just for wasted potential. The premise is that miners on Mars, who are told they are working to establish a new colony, are, in reality,

spoiler

just slaves on terraformed, livable Mars.

Fantastic premise, author can lean into the entire labor rights history of the early 20th century, worker strikes, revolutions, etc. Nope, the idea goes out of the window about 1/4 of the book through, and you get a really bad ripoff of Hunger Games.