Supporting Windows 10 PCs is about to get very expensive, but upgrading to Windows 11 poses significant hardware and software challenges for many organizations. What terror awaits when 1,000 applets IT never knew about crash after the upgrade?
For IT leaders, there is much to fear. How much of their current hardware is compatible with Windows 11? Far more critically, what about operational technology devices that manage industrial processes, on-prem legacy apps (including tons of homegrown code), and the unknown numbers of applets that IT doesn’t know about?
That “unknown” list includes inherited apps from the company’s last 50 acquisitions, as well as shadow apps that business units never bothered to report to corporate.
At the same time, there is a noticeable lack of enthusiasm among IT leaders for making the upgrade at all, given the perception that Windows 11 simply doesn’t offer much in terms of materially new or better functionality.
The decision is being forced, because Microsoft says that it will not add new capabilities or provide security patches for Windows 10 for corporate customers after October 14, 2025 — unless they enroll in the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program for Windows 10.
Microsoft is doubling the ESU price every year: For the first year, it will be $61/device, which will rise to $122/device for the second year and then $244/device for the third year. After that, the company says it will cut off all Windows 10 support entirely. (Microsoft did not respond to a Computerworld request for an interview for this story.)
Enrolling 5,000 Windows 10 PCs in ESU for the full three years would cost a business more than $2.1 million. A large organization that wants to keep 30,000 PCs on extended Windows 10 support for three years would have to pay more than $12.8 million to do so.
This leaves IT leaders having to choose between a potentially painful upgrade to Windows 11 and having to pay a massive amount of money for continued Windows 10 support, depending on how many seats will remain on Windows 10.
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)
Tech
1539 readers
219 users here now
A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes
Things that fit:
- New tech releases
- Major tech changes
- Major milestones for tech
- Major tech news such as data breaches, discontinuation
Things that don't fit
- Minor app updates
- Government legislation
- Company news
- Opinion pieces
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In large companies and governments, these kinds of decisions are made by IT Directors and Politicians and often they are just average users who are not tech savvy.
Then the IT Directors should be held accountable. Any good CEO, technically knowledgeable or not, should be able to identify the time and monetary cost of the Windows upgrade and trace it back to someone who made a poor decision.
The biggest problem is that M$ has had upperhand in big corpos and governments for a long time, Active Directory is their weapon.