this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
61 points (76.5% liked)

World News

46710 readers
2946 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Hamas’s broader plan [was] one that analysts say was intended not just to kill and capture Israelis, but to spark a conflagration that would sweep the region and lead to a wider conflict."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is just analyst opinions. The New Yorker actually interviewed a Hamas leader and got them on the record. He claimed that Israel left them no choice; non violent protests had failed and asking the UN for help failed, and moderate voices were ignored by Israel, meaning only violence was left.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

this explanation for the motive and the intentions described in the article are not mutually exclusive things

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No choice but to build a future with billions of dollars of yearly aid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So the only option left was to slaughter unarmed civilians. Eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. The better option was to hit military targets but who cares I guess, tit for tat is all we get

Obligatory fuck IDF and Bibi

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Thanks for pointing that out, I linked and quoted it below.