224
The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humans
(www.businessinsider.in)
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
224 points (100.0% liked)
News
28701 readers
4215 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But apparently using remotely controlled robots to distract or disable active shooters is going too far because the word "police" is attached to the concept? America is fucked, man. Don't even engage your thinking meat, just go whichever way the masses are pushing.
... dude, the takeaway from the military using killbots shouldn't be "we should let police use killbots too!"
So quick to jump to extremes. Does your imagination take you only as far as "killbot"?
Well police kill people with every other tool we give them so...
They've already blown people up with robots.
And there we go, thinking meat is off. No critical thought to be found, just parroting what the masses are screeching.
Watch out guys, we got a lone wolf here
lol
The evidence backs up the screeching, though.
Meanwhile, you just parrot what you hear on Paw Patrol 😂
Cops are not your friends.
Actually, if you're interested, it comes mostly from Police Activity, Code Blue Cam, and for a while, Donut Operator. Good channels. Police Activity is particularly unbiased and publishes body cam footage without narrative of the good and bad side of law enforcement, including the arrests of LEOs.
I have no delusions about cops being friends. I follow the pot brothers' advice to shut the fuck up (to the greatest extent my country's laws allow). But at the same time, persecuting an entire demographic based on their uniform is not only unproductive but dangerous. A person who is immediately confrontational towards cops (e.g. refusing to identify or follow orders while detained, or just being a dick) only invites a greater magnitude of response. It's like kicking a snarling dog - you'll get bit.
I certainly agree that cops are like snarling dogs, but that's no reason to give them killbots! I'm a good girl and meekly do what I'm told when the nice man with the gun and license to kill tells me to obey. I'm not going to fucking censor myself on the god damn Internet, though!
Also? Cops are not being persecuted. That's a joke.
Alex Jones go home
The word "police" isn't used once in the article you rage baiting dork
I was referring to an earlier event where San Francisco police proposed to use remotely operated robots in barricaded suspect situations to disorient or otherwise disable a shooter without putting additional lives at risk. Like putting a stun grenade and a breaching explosive on an RC car. The proposal was rejected, with one official admitting to not even understanding it, but voting nay because police robot bad.
That was apparently going too far, but using autonomous weapons in an international dick-waving contest is somehow okay because the targets are non-citizens on foreign soil.
I don't think the people who were against that robot are the same people who are supporting autonomous killer drones
They're hanging men and women for the wearing of the blue, but I'm not allowed to generalize an entire demographic? How does that work?
The last mob killing of a police officer I can name is when that guy got his skull caved in by Jan 6th rioters, thats the only thing close to "hanging.. for weraing the blue" i can name.