this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
390 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

70031 readers
6931 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech company has no data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hey, I worked for this moron and left because of these moronic statements.

Absolutely mind boggling that this company is “run on data” yet there’s no data besides anecdotes to support this backwards idea.

To make it even funnier, here’s an Amazon Director apologizing on LinkedIn because they thought forcing people to come into an office was the right thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Compromise is the moment a group has given up on finding the best solution

What a toxic and zero-sum viewpoint. What a stark admission that someone is unable to be willing to consider the possibility that someone else might be right, or at least partially right. If this philosophy was prevalent at Microsoft in 2010+, it would explain a number of Microsoft corporate decisions. Putting a smartphone touchscreen UI on a computer server product (Windows 2012) being just one obvious example.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Doesn't it also contradict his own decision? Below that quote he also says:

compromises that preserved cohesion were tantamount to "deciding to lose"

Forcing RTO is maintaining the status quo, which itself is a compromise you make to not do anything about the changes that happen as time goes on. He is literally making a compromise to preserve cohesion. But I guess in his mind him making compromises with himself don't count, the only compromise that matters is the one he has to make with others.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

if someone said this to me I'd be like "oh okay great. I won't compromise then. I'm working from home."

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If this dude "loved every minute of the 80+ hour work weeks of the early 2000's", feels like I can safely ignore anything he has to say about work

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He was in his early 20s based on his stated age, bro-ing out with beers and code, likely making gobs of startup money when you could still reasonably buy a house, which is likely worth 10x what it was then.

Now he makes 700k or more, living in his basically free house, and needs to put on a show for current 20 somethings like that is something good that can still happen to them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Word. But people change.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. I reread this twice because I felt like I had certainly read it wrong in the first place... which I had not...

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Working from home also had, from my observation, a massive and materially beneficial impact on females specifically working mothers, who bare a disproportionate share of domestic work.

Ew

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every single time some dude writes "females" I see this.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In business, all data are vanity metrics. If they make you look good, you slap that shit on everything; if they make you look bad, you "don't have it".

It's just that sometimes you can use negative data to make decisions that look good to those above you, and sometimes you know that you can't.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell, businesses might even keep asking you to keep changing criteria and numbers until they hear what they want to hear. I literally am dealing with this right now for a local retailer; they keep insisting that I keep changing criteria and numbers relating to how many sales they closed until they hear an answer they like. When I gave them the raw numbers, the owner and manager were straight-up in denial about it and said I was wrong and that the data is off because they felt it should have been a different number than presented.

Fucking frustrating and stupid, but that’s how upper management and corporate people can be apparently.