this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
702 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

68813 readers
5102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The one thing they don't really talk about is how it turns. The animations show vertical movement almost exclusively. At one point in the video there is a far shot showing a car turning and it looks like they actually swivel the entire motor to keep it perpendicular to the wheel which if true is going to pretty heavily limit it's turning angle and radius.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not a problem in RWD applications.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole pitch was based on replacing CV joints on front wheel drive vehicles.

From the presentation it looks limiting and to be honest it looks a bit overly complicated and likely to have some massive early growing pains. CV joints are comparatively simple and this is supposed to be more reliable? That's not how it works.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There's still CV-joints there in the video despite the uniwheel. You can't turn the wheels without one. I'm probably just not understanding this but seems like instead of making the drivetrain more simple this just adds more moving parts that's going to need oil changes and replacing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Always need a flexible joint such as CV or Universals to compensate for suspension movement. And they work in pairs, because +angular change is compensated by - angular change of opposite end of shaft.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Even if it was only useful at the rear, it would allow the battery to be moved further back and produce a better weight distribution. Most cars are front-heavy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My guess is they will only put this on rear-wheel-drive cars. The system doesn't look like it can rotate at all on that horizontal plane and moving the entire motor (that is sticking out of the back of the wheel) is basically a non-starter.

Edit, it may be possible to add another gear-set to enable rotation on the horizontal plane. But at that point I'm starting to wonder if the entire system is getting too complicated.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Like a CV joint? They kinda made a point in how great it was to get rid of the CV joint only to need to put it back in to get steering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The axis of the motor doesn't need to be parallel to the axis of the wheel.

If the axis of the motor is vertical, you could use a ring and pinion gear to transfer the torque to the driveshaft running out to the wheel, and have the steering wheels pivot around the axis of the motor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok but then torque changes when you turn the wheel. Hopefully the effects are too slight to matter

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think they're getting at the fact this design would generate massive amounts of torque steer. With the motor input vertical, any rotation will also try and change your steering direction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Driving the streering wheels exerts a force on the driving surface. That causes the steering wheels to have a tendency to toe in.

Looking from the top, you could run the motor clockwise on the right side and anti-clockwise on the left to cancel some of that, but the motor has very little leverage compared to the wheels.