this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
1588 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

17544 readers
1351 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean... I know Im not lying, and my comments are repeating the current standard. So either you retired 4 decades ago, or youre about as successful an ecologist as you are a conversationalist.

Letting your cat outdoors means its interacting with wild populations. That makes it succeptable to the same problems. An ecologist would know this.

A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors, so thats a confirmed lie. But at least its not breeding, yes.

Wildcats are often refered to as apex predators in their native environments, because they dont live near all those predators. But piddling over the exact definition of apex doesnt really stop your cat becoming a coyote meal.

This basic concept is a grade school science lesson. If you dont know algebra, why would I assume you took calculus classes?

Some of us, sure. I dont think youre part of that collective group though.

For starters, Ive never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife, or who completely ignores the massive issue of feline disease spreading.

E: I just noticed your edit, on apex predation. Do you genuinely think that cats cannot be an ecological threat to small mammal, reptile, and amphibian populations just because they can be eaten by larger locals? By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats.... Thats insanely fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By that logic, you are counting on your pet getting eaten. Thats.... Thats insanely fucked up.

And something an actual ecologist would have thought of, as you are essentially considering your pet cat as part of the food web, a high school level ecological concept.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Never met an ecologist who wants to feed their pets to the local wildlife."

"A responsible pet owner doesnt let their pets roam outdoors."

Dude. You're clearly not an ecologist, just some loudmouth repeating sensationalist, unfounded, unresearched pseudoscience. Just stop.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cited a decade old research paper with funding conflicts.

But my awareness of cat risk makes me not an ecologist?

Lol, ok. Your cat is likely riddled with parasites and other diseases, and might vanish one night in a smear of red alongside the road to die a slow, painful, lonely death.

But you keep spreading your lies. Im sure the slow, painful, lonely deaths of other peopled beloved pets makes it worth it to you.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m sure this is frustrating for you but I am enjoying every response you get that you then get to reply to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ill be completely honest, I am well aware this guy will change nothing. I feel horrid for their cat, who will certainly die young and die violently. But this isnt about facts, its about feeling right about past actions. And they dont want to face that previous pets probably died because of them.

But my comments serve as signposts for passersby, who will hopefully actually care about their pet and their local ecosystem, and do the right thing.

Lowkey sucks to deal with a whiney cat who is used to going outside, I get it, but you can harness train cats. Or build a catio.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AS a bystander in all this, could all of you... CITE YOUR DAMN SOURCES! If you have proof of your assertions via studies or research papers, LINK THEM!

Why?

Because this topic is of interest to me and I want to be informed with actual scientific data. Not by a person, but by peer-reviewed studies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should just look it up yourself.

Im not going to do anything different than you would. Open google scholar, put in various searches about outdoor cats, and read the newer articles.

Im not going to badger any of my real world friends about sources for a dumbass internet argument, and my memorized sources are all about my actual work, which is specialized in botanical study specifically.

Or reach out to your local university. Im sure there are a few local researchers who are plenty passionate about this and are invested in giving you specific local examples.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So no, you have no actual data to support you. Check

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

If being told that a random knock off reddit forum is not a high enough priority for me to go google things for you that you are fully capable of googling yourself, translates in your head into "theres no data at all" then you didnt want facts in the first place.

No one memorizes all studies ever written anywhere about anything. I specialize in botanical science. Cats? Not plants. So I dont have those studies titles and authors memorized.

To go find them, I would do what every other researher or grad student would do. Use google scholar. Which is very easy to use, and you can do it just fine yourself.

If you actually cared about the data, you can easily and quickly find it. But, you dont, so you wont.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I know who’s winning, imo! 😉

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah they're the loudmouth ....

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Enjoy getting trounced. It's obvious to everyone else.