this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
439 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70550 readers
3703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Won't they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn't you agree ?

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don't see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn't be too concerned about that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Exactly. They're getting massive handouts from our money. Let's cut out the middlemen and pay a utility directly.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone's rates regardless.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not where I live. All private Internet, but very limited choices that all keep getting more and more expensive.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

They also tend to deliberately stay out of each other's service areas so they can ramp up prices with de facto local monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I guess to answer that, wonder if your water, electric, or waste companies are gouging you. If they are, like in Texas, then yeah maybe?

Everywhere I lived, people and voting have strong control over utilities and they are fairly priced because it's a service not a business

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

Where I'm from if it goes public I'm sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it's private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it's expensive. It's a choice between the lesser of two evils.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Where I use to live was all private. CenturyLink was the only option as they had an agreement with Comcast that Comcast wouldn't come into my area.

I paid $60/month for 500kbps down. Yes kilobits.