this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
378 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22503 readers
3416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hey wait a minute I thought we were all voting for Republicans because the Democrats didn't immediately get Israel to do all the things we wanted them to do.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Literally who is voting Republican over Gaza? And before you say it, no. Not engaging with a two party election in which both candidates support genocide is not the same as voting for the one you don't like.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, we are voting against democrats because they continue to supply weaponry, ammunition, and a fucking carrier strike group to protect Israel from its own decisions.

If they want to massacre thousands of innocent children, let them do it on their own and take whatever fucking backlash they get.

They have no problems doing any of this as long as we are protecting them, let the chickens come home to roost on them

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's a third alternative for those who won't vote for Biden, but don't support Republicans. Primary. Essentially, picking democratic candidates that aren't endorsed by AIPAC on the downballot. We do have people like AOC, and Sanders whom that are against Israel, and Hamas.

That's more reasonable than voting against Democrats.

As far as consequences goes, Israel has been facing the prospect of decreased international support, but that will take a decade at best for it to be significant. Gen Z and Millennials don't really have good feelings toward Israel after their actions within war, and Israelis know it. It's on Israel to change policy along with a trial toward settlers and people that supports Netanyahu, and if they want them back, that's the only way to do it, otherwise, I don't see Israel having the longevity to avoid that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I went independent already.

The democrats are supporting too many conservative views for me.

The republicans are too far right.

The commies are too far left.

Although typing this out just now made non-binary people finally click in my head.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Questions.

Which democrats are conservative? Is Bernie/AOC a conservative? Are they a commie? There's a portion of the democratic party that aren't centrists.

Republicans are definitely too far-right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sanders is only a democrats because they forced him to be to run for president.

But right about there

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's a Independent that caucus with the Democratic Party. But, my point is that there's two wings of the Democratic Party. It's the Bernie wing of the Democratic Party that is to be supported mainly. That wing won't be a relevant party if it was a third party, the GOP needs to die before that can happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the party is shoving us to the side and only paying lip service to us and carting us out when it is time to vote, then are we really part of the party at all?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The thing is even intraparty feuds are resolved via compromises to minority wing. So yes, AOC wing of the Democratic Party do have some level of influences toward the Democratic Party.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>There’s a third alternative for those who won’t vote for Biden, but don’t support Republicans. Primary.

nah. i'm just going to vote for someone i want to win in the general like cornel west or jill stein.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Primary election is not the same thing as the general election. And the downballot is what I'm talking about, which is why Cornel West or Jill Stein isn't even part of it. So, people who can't be willing to vote for Biden, can vote for people in the downballot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You don't think that the alternative is worse? You don't think that Republicans will supply double the aid to Israel and half the aid to Ukraine?

It's a privileged position to be able to say "I want to wash my hands of the whole thing." People executing that privilege in 2016 got us to where we are today. People executing that privilege in 2004 got us to where we are today. People executing that privilege in 2000 got us to where we are today. How well do you think it's going to work out for you this year?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No some of us just aren't showing up to vote for Biden. Personally I'll be voting for a 3rd party candidate or writing in. We made it clear we didn't support Biden as a choice in the 2020 primaries. Progressives and leftists provided multiple alternatives we would have generally all backed in the general even though we definitely had our favorites.

Moderates responded by claiming "We can push Biden to the left." Many progressive and leftist voters took this to mean we had a seat at the table so we showed up in the 2020 general election. After four years of Biden it's very clear we continue to have no seat at the table despite being desperately needed to win the 2024 general election. Moderates continue to bank on using the fear of Trump to coerce progressives and leftists to show up to vote while having zero influence at all. Then they have a melt down and call us entitled when we say we've had enough and we're walking away from the table we don't have a seat at.

Moderates can either compromise with leftists or progressives or lose to fascists. It's really that simple.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, guess what's gonna happen then. If you are in danger of starving, do you refuse a bruised apple or wait for pizza?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Frankly I'm tired of these made up questions. Do you want to compromise with progressives and leftists or lose to fascists? Stop bargaining, make a choice and be confident that the outcome is what you chose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So your choice is to lose to fascists...? Because if people don't vote for Biden, Democrats will lose to fascists.

No made up analogy there. Straight up go to jail, don't pass go, end of democracy, Trump dictatorship. This honestly is not hyperbole this time around.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like y’all need our help but aren’t willing to listen to us.

I heard all this same shit last time.

I am done being the only one who has to compromise.

Fix your candidate if you want my votes

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you better try to work on moderates then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So even though you don't think it's what you're doing, you're choosing neutrality. And "neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim."

I'd consider myself more a leftist than not, but I'm not blind. Events like this make it quite clear how much worse the other option is. Neither side actually cares, so I'm going with the side that does the least harm, even though I don't think it goes far enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then you will continue to lap at their heels.

Or, you can stand up and find your voice and fight with us against it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

And how many people will the Republicans kill, disenfranchise, or otherwise dehumanize before somebody starts listening to my voice?

I certainly couldn't have that on my conscience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (18 children)

But you will if you guys continue to say fuck you to is.

You guys are choosing to run that candidate with all the risk that takes.

Why is it ALWAYS on us to give in to you guys?

If your person is popular enough he will win, if not, we’ll that’s the horse that y’all bet on knowing how so many of us feel.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stand up in the primaries, we're in the general election now. This is the only strategy that works with FPTP.

The 6 months before the general election is the only period when you don't want to create division. That gives you 3 years and 6 months for critical discussion which is fairly reasonable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Stand up in the primaries

We did. There were a wide range of leftist and progressive candidates to chose from. Moderates said "none of those we choose this old guy who's gonna block strikes, force federal workers back into the office and supply weapons to Israel."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

You're free to call yourself whatever you want but all you're doing is repeating moderate talking points for them. Whatever your beliefs are, your actions support moderate politics. The same politics which have failed to address Trump.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Trump Supreme court has intervened to shut down any meaningful progressive initiatives (see student loan forgiveness, for example).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think Biden fumbled that himself. Along with the BBB, increasing the defense budget, the CHIPS act and the way he treated the UAW. On top of that his appointments Yellen and Powell are in an outright war with American Workers, he pushed to block the rail strike and he's supplying weapons to Israel.

That's plenty of opportunities I can think of where Biden could have done something different. I'm open to other ideas as well. But if you're just trying to tell me Biden couldn't do anything different than he has that's a terrible sales pitch for someone you want me to vote for in the 2024 general. I'll be there but I'm gonna be voting 3rd party or a write in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I don't think anyone was arguing you can push Biden to the left. I guess you had that Bernie commission but nothing was promised beyond that. What happened is more people voted for Biden so he won. That's democracy.

I'm not saying you have to vote for Biden, you're allowed to do whatever, but it's not some fairy tale that by not voting for Biden you're helping Trump. You are, you just don't care. You would rather Trump be president for the next 4 years because you think Moderate Democrats will learn some lesson that they didn't the last time the exact same thing happened in 2016.

What will really happen is moderates will claim the candidate catered to the left so much that it turned off moderates (or pick a group, didnt cater enough to suburban Hispanics or whatever), and the Left will say the candidate didn't cater to the left enough, and in 2028 that won't be resolved and the person who wins the most votes will win again entirely unrelated to the question. So you're not sending the message you think you're sending, you're just hurting the candidate whose interests are the closest to yours. Allowed, but not what I'd recommend as a political strategy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What will really happen is moderates will claim the candidate catered to the left so much that it turned off moderates (or pick a group, didnt cater enough to suburban Hispanics or whatever), and the Left will say the candidate didn’t cater to the left enough, and in 2028 that won’t be resolved and the person who wins the most votes will win again entirely unrelated to the question.

But, thats what always happens anyways in every election, regardless if Trump is running or not.

So you’re not sending the message you think you’re sending, you’re just hurting the candidate whose interests are the closest to yours. Allowed, but not what I’d recommend as a political strategy.

I guarantee you, when they go back to do a postmortem post-election, and see a whole voting block not showing up, that'll definitely send a message.

They're actually already seeing it today, or do you not wonder why Biden keeps trying to pay off student loans every way he has available to him.

Its the party's responsibility to offer candidates that people can vote for, and not demand people to vote for the party so the other party does not win. Coercing a vote out of someone is not the American thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But, thats what always happens anyways in every election, regardless if Trump is running or not.

Right, my point is that you aren't "teaching moderate Democrats a lesson" by helping Trump. You're just helping Trump.

I guarantee you, when they go back to do a postmortem post-election, and see a whole voting block not showing up, that'll definitely send a message.

No post mortem has ever decided the candidate needed to be further from the center to gain more votes. I don't see why you think it would happen now. There are more people in the middle, and winning over a vote from Trump is worth twice as much as moving a non-voting Leftist to vote. Those are the tradeoffs of campaigning.

They're actually already seeing it today, or do you not wonder why Biden keeps trying to pay off student loans every way he has available to him.

Magnificent. Biden is doing something you like, this is somehow evidence of why you shouldn't vote for him.

Biden does some left wing stuff too, yes. He's not trying to alienate left wing people, he is doing electorally popular things, and he has to get Republicans on board for any law he wants to pass. This forces moderation. If you are demanding Medicare For All or you won't vote for him, you just aren't living in reality.

Its the party's responsibility to offer candidates that people can vote for, and not demand people to vote for the party so the other party does not win. Coercing a vote out of someone is not the American thing to do.

To be clear, the party isn't saying this, I am. Biden is trying to be popular to the widest swath of people possible, to beat Trump. If you're saying you're going to vote against him to send a message nobody is going to listen to, I think you're making a mistake and helping the guy you hate, way more than you are doing any good.

The way to send an inter-party message is in the primaries. Get your person (or a person significantly closer to you ideologically) to be the candidate and make everyone else choose between them or the guy they hate. If Bernie was the candidate I'd be telling moderates to vote for him just like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I honestly disagree with you on many of your assertions, but I have already voted in the primary to someone else besides Biden, to do that signaling you mentioned.

And as far as the student loan thing goes, the Democrats know they're really in trouble with the younger voting block, and the quantity and the insistence of them trying to do something over and over again is the point I was trying to bring to the discussion, to show that not voting party lines send signals (which you disagree with). Its not just about that I disagree with something that I like for him to do as you have asserted. It's a signal that they recognize already the problem and they're trying to course correct on it. The signal was received.

To bottom line this, it's the party's responsibility to save America from Trump, and not the voters. The party has to put up people that the voters will want to vote for. If he's not fit for office today, there's a good chance during the next four years he will become unfit for office.

For the good of the country, Biden should step aside, and let someone healthier run for the party nomination, OR have third party medical personnel confirm his cognitive abilities right now, and how long they will last throughout his whole second term in office, and make that information available publicly, so voters can use it to help decide on who to vote for.

load more comments (7 replies)