this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
361 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 155 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oculus could have been great, it's a shame that Meta metastasized and destroyed them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Yes. I was going to get one and instantly changed my mind when it was purchased by Facebook.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yep, instantly got crappier when it switched from oculus to Facebook. Maybe my memory is failing, but I thought I recall switching from oculus to Facebook and then recently from Facebook to meta account. Shitier and Shitier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember being excited about oculus when they started developing their headsets. Then I heard Facebook bought them, and the first thing Zuckerbot had to say about it was how excited he was to develop Virtual Reality advertisements. I have never lost as much interest in a product as quickly before or since.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Meta is cancer, pure and simple.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sacrifice might still end up being worth something as Facebook subsidised so much of the cost of the hardware in the push that they ended up selling over 20 million headsets introducing VR to a huge new audience. If that actually translates to long term VR users or fizzles down as a one-off curiosity we shall see in the coming years when those people are up for an upgrade.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One could argue that someone other than Facebook/Meta could have done better but I guess we'll never know for sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I know! Oculus would have been great at it! lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Better hardware, sure, but only Facebook was reckless and rich enough to risk throwing so much money at it. The reason competing headsets (index, HTC etc) are so expensive are because those companies need to turn profit from selling the headset. Facebook decided to try selling headsets basically at a loss, and hope to get money from the oculus store instead. That resulted in really cheap headsets that were much more affordable to curious people to just buy and try without a $1000+ investment and a requirement for a gaming PC.

That's something basically only Google, Facebook or Amazon, and maybe Tesla/Musk, could afford to try.