this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45829 readers
3290 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Corporations aren't run in a neoliberal way, though. They're usually run pretty much as a sort of a communistic hierarchy: decision-making is hierarchical and centralized; resources of all kinds are pooled; uniformity in behavior and looks is encouraged; internal and external propaganda is strong; and internal competition is discouraged. And finally, most of the benefits of the work, i.e. money, goes to the top.

So yeah, countries definitely aren't corporations, but the end result of that thought isn't perhaps what you imply.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Communistic hierarchy? Wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there's a school of thought among people that don't know wtf they're talking about which equates communism with authoritarianism

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Decades of red scare does weird things to a people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Red scare has a different tone to it when you live right next to Soviet Union.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I assume it's better than living in a South American country that just voted in someone left of center...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm talking about every instance when communism has been tried, instead of some fantasy theory that never seems to materialize.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't understand what makes a hierarchy communistic and what communism has to do with corporations.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporations (..) usually run pretty much as a sort of a communistic hierarchy

Wtf are you on about?? Typical corporate government is very much a feudal system where a few lieges receive the vast majority of the wealth produced by the workers. That's exactly the opposite of the aims of communism, exactly what communists rebelled against.

decision-making is hierarchical and centralized

Again, that's feudalism, not communism.

resources of all kinds are pooled

If by "pooled", you mean that the work of the many pays for the pools of the few, then sure.

uniformity in behavior and looks is encouraged

Which is a feature of conservatism and authoritarianism in general, including but not limited to conservative communism, fascism and paleoconservatism.

internal and external propaganda is strong

Again a feature of authoritarianism, demagoguery and tribalism, not specifically communism.

internal competition is discouraged

My ass it is! Corporations encourage internal competition in myriad ways, such as leader boards, employees of the month, competitions with some paltry prize for the workers who excel in some metric or the other compared to their peers, performance based promotions etc etc.

Internal competition is how corporations keep workers from banding together against their liege lords and ladies, so they encourage it at every opportunity.

most of the benefits of the work, i.e. money, goes to the top.

Again, the opposite of the intention of communism. I know that some nominally communist countries such as the USSR and China are actually one-party oligarchies, but they're examples of bad and dishonest leaders governing in ways contrary to the ideologies they pretend to believe in.

So yeah, countries definitely aren't corporations, but you clearly have bizarre misconceptions about both corporations and communism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's . . . that's not what feudalism was.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You did not seriously compare obviously capitalist companies to communism lmao

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mostly meant that in the sense that a country doesn’t need to be "profitable" or economical. They are the only actor on the market that can pursue other objectives than profit, like the welfare of the population or ecosystem, and also the only actor who can essentially ignore the rules because they make the rules.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Countries don't need to be profitable, but also they cannot be hundreds of millions in the negative.

They can ignore or change of course all the rules that have been made up, but nobody can ignore the principles of economics.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I’m not arguing they should throw all sense in the wind and do whatever, but obviously this radical type of neoliberalism is an utter failure in caring for the citizens. And I would argue the first and foremost responsibility of any government is to care for its people, not to make the country an attractive investment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That's funny, I remember when I started my first job on a chemistry research campus for a major corporation I would tell my coworkers that it feels like a sort of communist commute or something. All resources were logged centrally and I was open to borrow or take resources from completely different labs.