You're right. It's better than free. It sets those kids up for a healthier life, making them more well rounded into adulthood. It's a highly returning investment in our future.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But if they deserved to eat, they would've been born into families that could feed them.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"If they're going to die they'd better do it and decrease the surplus population!" Okay, Ebenezer, you go off.

[–] max@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Are you alright man?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

How much will the children have to pay each time they get a lunch? Or is it more like a subscription where they pay per month or something?

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not shit Sherlock, taxes would pay for it. Better to have our money feeding fat kids than buying more bombs for the IDF.