chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)
[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Rubbermaid, and that was two decades ago.

[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

By that logic, cum is just pee since it also comes out of the urethra.

Far North Spirits in MN has a bourbon. There's definitely places outside of Kentucky that make bourbon.

[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's never been president. That job ages you a decade or more.

On the global stage, it's the explosion in communication tech with little to no oversight. It's not even the first time is happened in the last century. Radio, newspaper, television, whenever there's a new, faster way to disseminate information we collectively forget how important it is to regulate that shit before something bad happens. That, plus regulatory capture weakening the limits on already existing information platforms.

... but that would be the d216 then, not the d666, if the naming convention is preserved.

[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Thanks McCarthy and the red scare! You did a real long-lasting number on rhetoric here in the states.

[โ€“] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Little caprice. So... any time in the last 18 years

 

No idea what's going on here, but figured I'd record it happening. Happened after scrolling past a post and then going back up.

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

 
view more: next โ€บ