this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
218 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68672 readers
3612 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Edit: an upstream comment led me to be able to find this article which does a way better job of explaining the DOJ complaints:

https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/21/24107669/doj-v-apple-apple-watch-messaging-digital-wallets-lock-in

Honestly, I would be happy if Apple addressed all of these things as long as doing so has absolutely zero chance of degrading my experience as their customer.

My original comment:

Apple already announced that it'll be supporting RCS sometime this year. Cloud streaming games have been available on iOS for years now, but prior they had to be a Web App and as of earlier this year that is no longer the case. Now they can be a regular app in the app store.

Superapps are hot garbage and should be banned. But WeChat exists on iPhone so I am honestly confused about this one. What features is it not allowed to have?

The NFC and wallet issue is a thing still.

The watch thing is a head scratcher. What API does Apple Watch currently use which 3rd party watches don't have access to? Because it seems like Apple is being blamed for other companies not making better products.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they didn't mention that every browser is just re skinned safari

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Right?

The complaints that they did list, many aren't valid anymore. But they didn't call out a lot of common complaints.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes yes. Apple Bad pls upvote me.

But in this case I pointed out some things that are wrong with the DOJ's complaints, one thing that is valid, and asked questions about two that nobody, and my searches, have answered. They seem to also be completely wrong on the DOJ side.

I doubt you use their products or will be affected by them being altered in any way, but I do and will, so this case interests me as do the details.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I doubt you use their products or will be affected by them being altered in any way

I use a MacBook pro daily but even if I didn't major lawsuits against monopolies affect me and everyone else

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Fortunately for you, this lawsuit doesn't involve the Mac.

Fortunately for the rest of us, Apple doesn't have anywhere near a monopoly in any industry, which is honestly where this case should be dismissed.

If you have to take a specific month out of the year, limit the region, and define a category as "performance" to get your numbers fudged and you still only get to 70% you're not exactly making a strong case for a monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Noonono see apple not bad all times

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's fair. Corporations are people. And people are the worst.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Superapps are hot garbage and should be banned.

What the hell. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it should be banned

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let me put it this way, superapps rely on harvesting and exploiting massive amounts of user data for profit, which is much worse than anything that Apple does. That aspect should be banned.

The quality of the service or content they provide is not my preference, but that's not what I was referring to as hot garbage in this case.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So ban harvesting and exploiting. Don’t ban superapps.

By your logic we should ban kitchen knives because they can be used to murder someone.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“What about!…” this adds nothing to discussions.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

What are you talking about? They very clearly presented a concrete solution of banning problematic behaviour rather than arbitrary categories of applications.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That wasn't what-aboutism, I was just using an analogy to make a point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you can reply to a text message using a third party watch on iOS but you can with your Apple watch. I've seen that cited as an exclusive API.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Thank you!

Searching for what you said got me this recent article which does a better job of explaining all the issues and complaints:

https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/21/24107669/doj-v-apple-apple-watch-messaging-digital-wallets-lock-in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell me you're an apple fanboy without telling me you're an apple fanboy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I tried to keep it super subtle but you got me!