this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30612 readers
972 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because liberals are just center of right. If you go too far left things become better for workers and not the ruling shit heads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

what happens when you go far left??

my last interaction with them convinced me they aren't any different from the alt right.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Allow me to enlighten you by illustrating how both sides are absolutely not the same

Some highlights:

There is a stark difference in the means with which the two groups engage in acts of extremism. In a study evaluating Left-Wing and Right-Wing domestic extremism between 1994 and 2020, there was one fatality as the result of Left-Wing extremism, versus 329 fatalities resulting from Far Right extremism in that 25 year period. [5]

The Far-Right movement is the oldest and most deadly form of domestic terrorism in the United States, and The Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism found that the Far-Right is responsible for 98% of extremist murders in the U.S. [24] Furthermore, for nearly every year since 2011, Far-Right terrorist attacks/plots have accounted for over half of all terror attacks/plots in the United States. [21]

In the U.S., Right-Wing extremism was responsible for two-thirds of all failed, foiled, or successful terror attacks in 2019, and was responsible for 90% of attacks in the first half of 2020 alone. [21] Since 2013, Far-Right extremism has been responsible for more terror attacks/plots than the Left-Wing, ethnonationalism, or religiously motivated attacks/plots. [21]

References

These are excerpts from a blog post of mine, but I have ads turned off and do not benefit in any way from it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so,same shit different pile??

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I did,it compared right wing extermism to left wing extremism. one had more death than the other but extremism nonetheless...hence same shit different pile.

or are you suggesting being a left wing extremist is the better option than say being in the middle ground...because death??

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One death from left wing extremism in 25 years, versus 329 from the right, 32900% more. To say that this is the "same shit" is clearly absurd. We aren't discussing the merits of the middle ground. You seem to be suggesting that just because something is labelled as "extremist" it is automatically bad, regardless of what it actually is or what harm it causes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

one extreme isn't exactly better than the other. they are extremes and should be regarded as such.

left extremism does not represent good neither does it represent evil,same goes for right wing extremism.

what i find interesting is people seem to think left wing extremism is the ONLY way to go,ignoring the fact that left wing extremism also practice discrimination, ostracism,bigotry and racism,not that much different from right wing extremism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Extremes are all relative, no? The political views that are centrist today would be extreme 100 years ago. Just saying they're extreme and therefore bad is a weak argument.

Sure there are bigots on both sides, there are bigots outside the extremes too. There are centrist bigots! There, now I've shown that extremism is just the same as centrism... Obviously that doesn't work, though, does it? You can't just pick one thing that happens and say "well everyone does this so they're all the same"... Does it happen to the same degree? What are it's consequences?

I think you'll find significantly more racism, sexism, etc on the right... Far right extenists are literal Nazis and white supremacists! Feminism, the civil rights movement, pride movement, etc, are all left-aligned... Extremist leftists sometimes lose sight of one aspect of this, but they so obviously aren't the same as literal fucking Nazis!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you sound like a leftist apologist now.

you don't need to be a leftist nazi to be an actual nazi,the same as the right.

what i also find interesting is leftist seemed to use the same reasoning to justify their extremism,not that much different from the right. no justification is enough on either side be be a nazi or behave like one.

as far as i can tell:

the right is consistently crazy.

the left has been getting consistently crazier.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What are you talking about? Nazism is a fundamentally right-aligned ideology, how can you argue otherwise? You can invent definitions of what "left" or "right" means to suit you if you want, but why bother saying anything if you're going to make up the meanings of words?

Can you tell me what a "leftist" is? Or what they might want for the world? Can you tell me what a Nazi is? And then why you think there are parallels?

I just don't believe that anyone who understands what these words mean would think they are alike.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

so left wing extremists aren't bigots, don't discriminate, don't spread hate or behave exactly like a nazi would???

a left wing extremist will behave exactly like their right wing counterparts. they exhibit behaviours just like those right wing nutjobs.

you call right wing extremist nazis,i agree. i call left wing extremists nazis in disguise.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If someone is behaving like a nazi they aren't a left wing extremist. The OG Nazis called themselves socialists - but they were not socialists, were they? They were fascists.

Can you show me any of these extremists who you think are both on the left and Nazis? And explain why you think they are both of those things?

And to be clear - I am not calling all right wing extremists Nazis. All Nazis are right wing extremists, not all right wing extremists are Nazis. You seem to be content to throw the word around for anyone who you disagree with, but it is in fact a word that represents a specific political ideology which occupies a particular place on the spectrum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

perhaps you can explain how a trans activist can label anyone who doesn't align with their beliefs a transphobe or when anyone who believes a man isn't a woman is automatically a transphobe.

you seem to think left wing extremists cannot behave like a nazi and if they do,they aren't leftist but fascist.

i mean i seldom hear of fascists advocating equal rights for the lgbtq community but i do come across left wing extremists advocating their left wing ideas and then behaving like a nazi if anyone so much as disagree.

our discourse here is you seemingly trying to convince me left wing nutjobs cannot be nazis,only right wing can,where in fact i have been saying both sides are behaving like a nazi and no one side is better than the other.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What is "behaving like a nazi" to you? Are these trans activists advocating the extermination of the Jews? No? Then they probably aren't fucking Nazis are they.

It's hilarious that you're accusing trans activists of "labelling anyone who disagrees with them" as teansphobes... While yourself labelling anyone you disagree with a nazi, with no regard to what the word actually means!

Please, define what Nazi means to you, because otherwise this conversation is pointless.

Edit to add: and seriously, to you "trans women are women" is the same level as "we should exterminate the Jews"? What the fuck dude?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

u seriously think i was labeling anyone who disagreed with me a nazi?? the ones that were labeling me was exactly those left wing nutjobs.

if you want to compare what your meaning of nazi is against mine,please do define what nazi means to you in a concise manner and we can compare notes,otherwise i agree,this exchange isn't going anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would define a Nazi as someone who follows or supports the socio-political ideology Nazism - to quote Wikipedia:

the far-right totalitarian socio-political ideology and practices associated with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in Germany.

I would also include neo-Nazis who, again quoting Wiki:

seek to revive and reinstate Nazi ideology

I will grant you that some people use the word in a much weaker way (see "grammar nazi"), which I find frustrating but I have to acknowledge is a modern usage... but not the one I have been using in this conversation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

here's mine:

nazi or nazism (a form of fascism ) is an anti-intellectual and politically semi-illiterate ideology lacking cohesion, a product of mass culture which allowed its followers emotional attachment and offered a simplified and easily-digestible world-view based on a political mythology for the masses.

From wiki:

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement,[1][2][3] characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

in short: racism,bigotry,suppression and the belief that one's ideology is better for the masses.

so you tell me,when the extreme left wingers are found not guilty of doing the same as their right wing counter parts?? or you are saying people who advocate leftist ideals, who supresses opposing views aren't exactly leftist but fascists promoting equality,acceptance,diversity or tolerance??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so you tell me,when the extreme left wingers are found not guilty of doing the same as their right wing counter parts??

I'm not sure what you're asking here. Are you suggesting that modern leftists are fascists?

The origin of this conversation was the your idea that left- and right-wing extremism is the same. My position is they are different. I'm not saying that people on the far left don't do some of the things that the Nazis did. It would be impossible, really, I mean they also built roads but I'm not about to call civil engineers Nazis. Looking at modern (i.e. neo-) Nazis, my point is that they are not comparable to left-wing extremists around today. Their views are not similar, their goals are not similar, their methods are not similar. Can you find a racist leftist? Of course. Can you find a non-racist Nazi? No.

I'll stop using Nazis or neo-Nazis as examples, though, because it's clearly not helpful. Consider white supremacists, instead, if that helps.

Going back to the other commenter who shared the blog post - we see that far right extremism is responsible for >90% of extremist murders in the US in recent years. Clearly far left extremism cannot compete! The trans activists you mentioned earlier, are they similar? Are they going out and killing people? I glossed over it before but your point was that they "label" anyone who "disagrees with them" as a transphobe... Even if you disagree with that label, it hardly seems comparable to killing people. ___

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the idea here is left wingers are also completely capable of behaving like right wingers. both end of the extreme aren't that much different in a sense that they are basically extremes that drives people to behaving badly, uncivil,intolerant and discrimitory.

while one side is more violent than the other,it does not absolve them of the violence they commit no matter the justification and violence as we all know, comes in different forms.

if nazi is a word specifically reserved for a group of individuals then extremists would have been a better word to use,given the 2 extremes aren't necessary better than the other but is equally bad if left unchecked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

both end of the extreme aren’t that much different in a sense that they are basically extremes that drives people to behaving badly, uncivil,intolerant and discrimitory

The extremes are different, the behaviours are different... wildly so! One extreme involves advocating for the extermination of entire peoples, while the best example of the other extreme you can come up with so far is accusing people of transphobia! How can you think these are the same? And they "drive" people to obviously very different ends, too! The far right version of "behaving badly" is fucking murdering people, while the far left version is apparently being mean to you on the internet.

Please, provide an example of leftists actually doing something you think is as bad as killing people, or advocating genocide. Otherwise it seems like you are the apologist - and you aren't just an apologist of some nebulous group who you won't define, as you accused me of, you are actually being an apologist for far right child murderers. Because by comparing the far right's crimes to something as people on the internet policing language you are minimising those crimes, and that is a disservice to the victims of those crimes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

aaron danielson ring any bells?? how about antifa??

far left extremists are completely capable of terrorist and other deadly behaviours the question is when and where.

like i have written ,they are extremes,none is better than the other. you aren't changing my mind on. the right wing nuts jobs and certainly not the left wing extremists.

i concur,this conversation isn't really going anywhere other than you trying to change my mind on the left.

the right wing nutjobs are crazy for sure but the left wing nutjons are getting crazier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Antifa might be violent, but they are violent in their opposition to violent ideologies, not to random members of the public. Aaron Danielson, I'll take a guess, is the single example of someone actually being killed by a far left terrorist in the US in a 25 year period, mentioned by the earlier commenter.

far left extremists are completely capable of terrorist and other deadly behaviours the question is when and where.

Sure, I mean Pol Pot was a communist, he killed loads of people in Cambodia in the 1970s. But today? There is objective evidence that the far right is worse!

i concur,this conversation isn’t really going anywhere other than you trying to change my mind on the left.

I'm trying to convince you, and anyone reading this, that the left is not the same as the right. If you can't see that, well that's on you. You have been deluded by the right. You think you're in the middle, but you aren't. You are sitting with and minimising the abundant actual crimes of racists and bigots by trying to equate them with trivial internet bullshit and a single solitary actual murder.

the right wing nutjobs are crazy for sure but the left wing nutjons are getting crazier.

Hahahah, the left is getting more reasonable with time, not less! I mean, I refer again to Pol Pot, do you see anyone like that on the left today? Nowadays the right are just getting more sensitive, and people like you are whining because you aren't allowed to be transphobic without people being mean to you and hurting your feelings. Get a grip.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"Extremism" doesn't inherently mean "violent." Equating those with far-left views with "bad and violent" views is unsubstantiated.

Every single claim you've made, that extremism is bad because it drives people to "behave badly" is unsubstantiated. You're arguing off of vibes alone.

The two extremes are not "equally bad." On the far-right, you have genocide and ethno-states under brutal fascist rule, on the far left you have a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a left-wing extremist and believe absolutely nothing that you've invented for left-wing extremists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just keep making shit up 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

will do,thanks for the encouragement 😊

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who all is arguing in support of Left-Wing extremism? Other than select instances, most users on lemmy do not by any means support tankies. I for one can't stand them.

They can be just as out of touch with reality as a MAGA extremist, but to say both sides are the same is blatantly false. Far-Right extremism is spreading across the globe and it threatens and takes lives and destroys family systems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i agree far right extremism is destroying lives and family system. the abolishment of roe vs wade have already proven very clearly what happens when right wing nutjobs run amok.

we also clearly seen how devastating it can be for children as young as 5 to be on hormones treatment because their woke parents thinks their kid is trans.

same extremism same kind of outcome.not one is better than the other.how do people simply think left wing extremism is inherently better or not the same as right wing extremism is beyond me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"I agree, this fascist ploy that removed fundamental rights from dozens of millions of women is dangeroous! But have you considered this scenario I imagined that impacted nobody irl? Totally the same!"

Left wing extremism is better because it's morally correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

sure thing buddy,whatever floats your boat😊

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can understand that extremism isn't inherently good or bad, what matters is what's correct, why do you have to lie and pretend the left supports racism, discriminatuon, ostracism, and bigotry when the extreme left combats those as foundation?

This is a mind-numbing take only possible by a privledged person who has never spoken to a leftist, only heard about them through Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, and Ben Shapiro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so far,the leftist are here calling me a rightoid,transphobe,homophobe signs of what right wing extremists does.

so you tell me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are right-wing, so that's true. You've also been repeating LibsOfTikTok-style lies about the left "transing kids," which is debunked nonsense, and is in fact transphobic to peddle. I haven't seen any homophobia from you yet, but the other 2 are correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

sure thing buddy if you say so.😊

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Extremism is not good or bad, just like being in the middle is not good or bad either. What matters is what's correct.

For example, between being pro-fascism and anti-fascism, anti-fascism is both extreme and correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sure,if that's what you think is correct.

i am sure when you preach that being gay is God's intention,i am sure Christians and Muslim will agree that correct.

don't forget to label me a homophobe if that's what it is now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't preach, I'm not religious. You're now putting words directly in my mouth because that's all you've done from the start: lie about fake leftists that hurt your feelings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

now that's putting words in ones mouth!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No. Completely different and entirely incompatible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

When you go far left, you have ideologies like Socialism, Communism, and Anarchism, all ideologies that oppose unjust hierarchy and advocate for the good of all.

The far-right is completely different from the far-left, because the far-right has ideologies like fascism and feudalism. This is an inherently violent, reactionary position found to uphold the status quo, ie the division of power, via absolute measures.

These are not the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This simply means you're either a liberal or a fascist.