this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
553 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8111 readers
2435 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And that's with the delay...

But the more people buy after they buy, the more they make.

No one is "sticking it to the man" doing this, they're making "the man" even more money by following behind them,.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one using this would be trying to "stick it to the man" by doing this. They're trying to get some scrapes from the man by doing this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But to fix the problem we need to regulate their trading and get donor money out of politics.

You're talking about a bandaid that stops the bleeding but not infection.

We need a long-term solution

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this is supposed to be a solution to anything, though there is no article to (not) read.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The two party system as it exists today is the solution to voters having a say about these things.

And every cycle they both tighten their hold on voters.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The method described in the post is more like the fish that follow sharks around. They aren't there to stop the shark, they are there to eat.

To stop the shark requires an entirely separate effort

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except the shark is eating fish, and the scavenger fish are eating the scraps from their friends' dead bodies....

I mean, if you really want to go deep on the analogy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sure, but youre criticizing that this isnt going to fix anything. Its not meant to, its an attempt to also benefit from a rigged system. An entirely separate effort is required to solve the rigging.

Also, even without sharks around fish still eat other fish. This isnt the sharks doing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

even without sharks around fish still eat other fish.

That's kind of like saying school shootings aren't a big deal because we all die eventually...

I dunno man, I don't think you're gonna get this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm saying this is the farthest thing from a solution. It's the opposite of a solution. People doing these investments are increasing the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The phrase "get money out of politics" has been repeated millions upon millions of times in public and private venues and nobody has defined what that phrase means and how to do it. It's vagueness makes it useless. Try "abolish corporate lobbyist bribery" or anything that more specifically points out that you are being taxed without representation because you can never give enough money to ever be heard by your representatives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because you don't understand something, doesn't mean no one else does...

I googled this in 2 seconds...

https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/campaign-finance-reform

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is that supposed to be some sort of "own"?

You did not understand the assignment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good news!

I figured out why you think no one can explain it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You linked to one dead campaign that was pledging not to accept campaign contributions and which calls for "meaningful reform" instead of abolition. "Reform" is just repackaging. She lost, btw.

What I am telling you is that the wording is wrong because it's cheap, vague, and ineffective. It's the kind of thing that rednecks say while leaning on their pickup trucks.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah looks like there's at least a week of delay. I would love to see some data about this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"invested" does not mean profited