Music

9334 readers

284 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - [email protected]

Jazz -[email protected]

Album Art Porn - [email protected]

Fake Album Covers - [email protected]

Obscure Music - [email protected]

Vinyl and LP's - [email protected]

Electronic Dance Music - [email protected]

60's Music - [email protected]

70's Music - [email protected]

80's Music - [email protected]

90's Music - [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

243

How are musicians supposed to survive on $0.00173 per stream? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Actually while typing that out I thought more about the technical architecture of such distributed alternative streaming service that pays artists fairly, and it does sound like it could be fun to build.

But everyone in the fediverse already knows how difficult/impossible it is to get the average person to switch to open source software. It would most likely be a waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Here's a person who knows way more about the music industry than all of us in this thread out together. And he's thought a lot about this, too

Not so much the fediverse side of it, but the legal, and financial/jobs side of things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Here's

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think you can get people to agree on what's "fair" but it's always fun to think about. What would your fair payment scheme look like?