this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1495 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7910 readers
3462 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't think many people are saying that Biden is the same as Trump or just as bad as Trump. I think most progressives, for instance, would agree that Biden is better than Trump, it's just that that's such a low bar. I mean, are liberals really surprised that people aren't all that impressed with a president whose main selling point is that he's not as bad as the only alternative? Now, I get that liberals don't see it that way, I understand that liberals, apparently, are really very happy with Joe Biden, but for the rest of us he is only the least bad option.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In some parts of Lemmy, they are absolutely making that argument.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would imagine those people are Marxists, or other anti-capitalists. If you're somebody whose primary litmus test is whether a candidate is pro-capitalist or anti-capitalist, you might not see much of a difference between Biden and Trump because they are both staunchly pro-capitalist. But I think those people are overrepresented on lemmy and only make up a very small percentage of the actual US voter base.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or perhaps these people live in the middle east or africa and every day they get a taste of "capitalism".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's very weird to see people say "Biden is awful. I won't support him anymore" and get "Why didn't you say that about Donald Trump?!!!" thrown back at them.

At some point, insisting that Donald Trump will ALSO do a genocide, so you need to donate all your money to the Biden campaign and block walk for him... Fucking bananas.

Even Obama didn't get this kind of Ride or Die support from Democrats.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because Trump has said he wants the genocide to be stronger. Biden wants it to end, but isn't doing much to stop it. Trump also wants to go after minorities in the US.

Obama didn't get the same support because his opponent wasn't even close to as bad. Trump has already tried to overturn democracy. Republicans have also put together a plan to innact a Christo-fascist dictatorship (project 2025). The elections with Obama were business as usual. This election is, for many people, life or death, and potentially the last hope for democracy.

Also, Obama was cooler than Biden but he wasn't better. Honestly, I think if you were to compare their actions as president, Biden would be better. He still sucks, but he's much better than I expected (very low bar). They're just not great at communicating what he's done.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trump has said he wants the genocide to be stronger.

And Mitt Romney said "Double Gitmo". That doesn't absolve Obama or Biden for keeping the illegal torture prison open during their terms.

You don't absolve yourself of genocide by saying "Well, it was either me or Mega-Hitler"

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t absolve yourself of genocide by saying “Well, it was either me or Mega-Hitler”

What? So let's apply this to 1930s Germany.

Your stance is that, if Hitlers political rivals stood for anything "wrong" by your moral code, whatever that is, that voters were in the right to not vote against literally Hitler?

That's taking "two wrongs don't make a right" to extreme absolutes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Your stance is that, if Hitlers political rivals stood for anything “wrong” by your moral code, whatever that is, that voters were in the right to not vote against literally Hitler?

This was what brought down the Hindenburg government, in fact. His performance in the Presidency was notoriously abysmal and his country suffered enormously under his tenure. In fact, one could very easily argue that Hindenburg's failures created the Nazi Party, as disaffected voters fled the traditional political sphere for the edges of the ideological map - to the Nazis, the Communists, and the Friekorps radicals..

It was, after all, Hindenburg himself who appointed Hitler to the Chancellorship, because he considered Hitler someone he could compromise with.

This is a shockingly similar position to the current Biden/Schumer Congress, which consistently attempts to negotiate with "moderates" in the Republican Party even to this day.

That’s taking “two wrongs don’t make a right” to extreme absolutes.

Looking at the trajectory the conservative wing of the Democratic Party has us on, and comparing it to the Weimer Republic, reveals some terrifying parallels.

This isn't "two wrongs make a right" nearly so much as it is "the marginal less or two evils is still unconscionable".

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No one is saying they're absolved. Where have you heard that?

The fact of the matter is that if you don't like genocide or gitmo or whatever other horrible things, you should vote for the person who at worst wants to maintain the status quo of horrible things.

That said, Obama wanted to close Gitmo. Biden has also condemned Israel's attacks, and the US has warned them to stop. We've also stopped some military aid to them, but obviously not all. The recent jets, for example, still happened, but they're air-superiority fighters which serve no use against Palestine. We've also continued to send a lot of other defensive aid, though offensive has slowed down if not stopped. To imply Obama or Biden didn't try to do anything is ignorance at best, if not an outright lie. The fact of the matter is that much of it is handled by congress though, and republicans in congress will stop a Democrat from doing essentially anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because the reality of our shitty political system is that not supporting the only viable non-fascist candidate means supporting the one that is. It only actually matters in the handful of swing states, but the internet is worldwide and heaping negativity about supporting the non-fascist candidate can matter. This doesn't mean you shouldn't criticize Biden and the Democrats for their many failings, but not supporting him in the election for the sake of the country is cutting off your nose to spite your face.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the reality of our shitty political system is that not supporting the only viable non-fascist candidate means supporting the one that is.

Isn't this a little disingenuous? Or maybe individualism is so ingrained in the western psyche that people honestly don't see the asymmetry of this framing.

The reality of our political system is that the only way to get change is to demand it from the people who need your vote. By giving your vote without demanding change, you're supporting the system that disenfranchises you (and you're supporting the binary choice that was given to you by it).

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Isn't this a little disingenuous?

No, not even slightly

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not supporting the only viable non-fascist candidate

If

You're

Doing

Genocide

Then

You're

A

Fascist

Candidate

[–] twack@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are aware that fascism already has a definition, correct? It's not just someone doing something that you don't agree with.

Please don't water down a word that has very serious implications right now.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not just someone doing something that you don’t agree with.

Are we trying to do moral relativism on genocide?

The IDF knowingly and deliberately bombed food aid workers in clearly marked vehicles on a road designated for food aid delivery, entirely for the purpose of starving out war refugees.

They did that with munitions built and supplied by the American government.

And when questioned, the American National Security Secretary said it was the IDF's prerogative to bomb them.

This was deliberate, calculated, cold blooded murder of aid workers done with the participation of the US military under the command of President Joe Biden.

[–] twack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything you just said has nothing to do with fascism and is therefore irrelevant to the term.

I'm not saying that any of that is ok, but that doesn't make it fascism.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Everything you just said has nothing to do with fascism

Polices of genocide and the ideology that justify it are both elements of fascist tendency.

Deliberately ignorance of the existence and perpetuation of genocidal policy is traditionally referred to as "Holocaust Denial", another classic fascist technique.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they literally saying they are the same person? That they share the same atoms?

Or is the point that they are the same in the most important ways?

Maybe your disagreement is over what qualities/policies are most important, but accusing them for being blind is easier than addressing the actual disagreement?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The arguments are that Biden is just as bad as Trump.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it doesn't occur to you to ask by what metrics they think that? All metrics? One metric? A spattering of metrics?

accusing them for being blind is easier than addressing the actual disagreement

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you agree that people on Lemmy are arguing that Biden is just as bad as Trump.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People on Lemmy are arguing that Biden is just as bad as Trump in the most important ways.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, idk I see a few differences between your statement and mine

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is that so important? It is implied in the comparison of two people. We aren't comparing unimportant differences between the two. We aren't comparing Biden and Trump's fashion sense or taste in food.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why is that so important?

Because otherwise it sounds like the things they have in common are unimportant, like their fashion sense or taste in food.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is exactly how nothing ever gets done. Only criticize, never do anything, create the feeling that getting involved is pointless because"they're all the same anyway".

I hate that humans are so awful at nuance. People could absolutely praise and condemn the same person for different actions, instead they want to boil down that person's entire existence to "good, bad, different, same". And we all suffer for that

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

And this is exactly how nothing ever gets done

I disagree, i think insisting on accepting a binary choice is how nothing ever gets done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] S_204@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemmy is farther from real life than Tumblr or 4chan, be real.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok and we're on lemmy right now talking about it so wtf is your point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you talked with Republicans, though? This has always been the way of a republican. Democrat does bad things, republican does bad thing. To them it’s a wash even though what the Republican did was 100 times worse.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This meme is targeting leftists, not republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think many people are saying that Biden is the same as Trump or just as bad as Trump.

You wrote this on Lemmy. I don't see how you missed how popular this attitude is.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think people who want no criticism of Biden choose to believe that any criticism at all of Biden is the same thing as saying Biden is the same as Trump.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recognize you as one of the people I'm talking about so it's no surprise you'd say some baloney like this

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I've never said Biden is the same as or just as bad as Trump. You on the other hand love to be hostile to anyone opposed to genocide.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

are liberals really surprised that people aren’t all that impressed with a president whose main selling point is that he’s not as bad as the only alternative?

When your opponent is Trump, it's kind of hard for that to not be the main selling point; he could be the best president ever and that would likely still be true.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he could be the best president ever and that would likely still be true.

If he were the best president ever, he might have something better to run on than "at least I'm second worst to Trump."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)