this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
British Columbia
1659 readers
10 users here now
News, highlights and more relating to this great province!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If there is a great benefit to all people by getting injected without any disclosure of ingredients from companies making billions of dollars, how is there people who have never had an injection in their whole life still walking around and performing work duties without it?
If some people were killed and disabled by the injections, and others are doing fine with the injections, along with those who never got it were killed and others who have never had it are living successful lives, where is the benefit to getting it if people are living happily without it?
You are officially arguing in bad faith. You don’t understand anything about public heath and nothing about immunity or immunology. You have made declarative statements without proof.
I was first giving you the benefit of the doubt…
There's the option of listening to practicing virologists give presentations with a breakdown of why nobody needs the covid vaccine because it is not a vaccine and has nothing in common what was previously labelled as a vaccine before covid. It was only created so billonaires could sell the injections for their companies to make even more billions of dollars.
Brandolini's law in practice.
Thank you for this, never heard of it until now.
"Big pharma bad" means everything they ever do must be an evil conspiracy! The concesus among the millions of physicians and medical researchers of the world means they are all in on it too!
Because that's how a society functions, and that's how vaccines work.
When a vaccine is effective against a pandemic, it prevents it from spreading. If there are not enough places for the virus to live, or it can't get to a new place to continue living... it dies out.
There is a tipping point where enough people have been vaccinated that the virus can't proliferate... which means people at risk from rare side effects of vaccination don't have to be vaccinated.
People have undiagnosed health issues and end up in hospital from roller coasters or from tying their shoes.
Like how deforestation drives species to extinction. There are still forests around, but the species that go extinct can't get to another forest and end up dying.
Except vaccination has the positive effect of saving lives, whereas deforestation just ruins ecologies.
Then people are correct to reject any and all vaccines and see what the results are. Anti-vaxers will have a healthier, stronger, robust immune system.
That totally sounds Ike a reasonable conclusion to draw from this exchange.
Oh wait, no, it’s not. It’s just a complete stark raving mad non sequitur.
Polio says you're wrong.