this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
2148 points (99.9% liked)

Political Memes

8643 readers
3435 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
2148
Just a reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 165 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

I love how the propagandists just keep beating the same drum after the Biden administration has constructed a ceasefire deal which has received unanimous UN Security Council support, and did appear to be moving forward until about 14 hours ago. (Edit: It might still, that's not over yet.)

It's almost like if the US just turns its back on Israel, we'd lose our leverage to press a negotiated agreement, which would surely not end with Israel digging in their heels even further. (/s) It's almost like geopolitics are - wait for it - complicated.

Second Edit: Let's also not forget that Israel is a nuclear power. What do you think happens when Israel's back is against the wall, they're running out of conventional weapons, and Iran and/or other groups decide to take advantage?

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (44 children)

It was unanimous because Russia abstained. Putin loves the refocus on Israel while he continues his genocidal war crimes in Ukraine under the US media radar.

For those who haven’t been keeping up, Russia has abducted 700,000 Ukrainian children to be raised as Russians in foster homes since the war began. It’s genocide on a scale 20 times larger than Palestine, and isn’t making national headlines in the US due to the focus on Israel.

The US formally declared this as genocide in the House of Representatives with a 390-9 vote in April by invoking the UN Genocide Convention, and the ICC has issued arrest warrants. Did you see any headlines about that?

Russia is also the largest investor in the sanctioned Iran economy that is directly funding Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And yet not a peep from these “Genocide Joe” people. They’re either Russian disinformation agents, or useful idiots.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was sceptical of this claim so I did some research - 700,000 is almost certainly too high, but other than that it's disturbingly true:

The 700,000 number comes from a Russian parliamentarian in 2023, and refers to orphaned and abandoned children Russia has 'protected' from conflict zones in Ukraine. A later Russian report walked this back a bit, and claimed that most of this number were children accompanied by family voluntarily escaping the fighting by feeling into Russia.

Obviously we should be sceptical of what Russia says about this, but this is not the same number as the number of children abducted - not even Ukraine alleges it to be this high.

The number of children abducted and forcibly deported was officially reported by Kyev to be 19,000 to 20,000 at the time of the above claim based on the data (nearly 30,000 now). The real number is almost certainly higher - many Ukranian officials believe the actual amount is higher, with one saying it may be into the 'hundreds of thousands'. A US report in 2022 estimates that Russia has "interrogated, detained, and forcibly deported... 260,000 children, from their homes to Russia"

Even if we take only the low amount that can be fairly positively stated as abductions, that's nearly 30,000 children. Various reports have shown some of these children being given new Russian identities and false birth certificates, and being put up for adoption in Russia. Some have testified to being indoctrinated and shown pro-Kremlin propaganda.

This broadly constitutes Cultural Genocide - whether it technically is or not is for academics to argue over, because the legal definition of genocide is complicated and so much is unkown.

Whether or not you want to call it a Genocide, it is undeniably a War Crime. The ICC has issued arrest warrents for Putin and Russian Children's Rights Commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova over this.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Regardless of the number, it was deemed genocide in a 390-9 vote in the House in April, by invoking the UN Genocide Convention.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/us-house-resolution-russian-abduction-of-ukrainian-children-is-genocide/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

And you can’t even bring this up as an argument against the “gEnOciDe jOe” kids because it gets removed for “whataboutism” in almost every thread.

They have their agenda pretty locked down

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm legit not trying to troll here, but I vaguely recall a news story last month where Biden said it's not genocide. I forget if he was referring to Ukraine or Gaza, but either way I was kind of dumbfounded like wtf.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But hey, some rando with literally no national attention is polling at 3% in a couple of safely blue states, so definitely don’t vote for GeNoCiDe JoE! /s

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (26 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Oh I’ve noticed. The way I see it, there are three options when it comes to the “both sides”/protest vote camp, every single one of them is one of the following:

  • a bad faith actor cosplaying as a leftist
  • an accelerationist
  • a misguided idealist who legitimately believes a non-mainstream candidate could win and/or completely disregards the cold hard fact that FPTP means a third party/abstain vote simply endangers the lesser of two evils candidate while empowering the greater of two evils candidate

No matter what I will never stop throwing shade at that crowd hard and heavy. The first two on that list will never change. I do hope, however, that continued social pressure on that last type of person will make some of them realize that voting is just as much a responsibility as a right, and consider that maybe there’s a good reason their views are so unpopular.

Edited after a good point made by samus12345.

Also I noticed the single downvote on every one of my comments. I know who you are lol. Glad to see I’m still living in your head rent-free.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I think there are also misguided idealists who think it's more important that they feel good about not voting for the "genocide" guy while absolving themselves of any blame should his opponent win. They know a third party candidate can't win, but that's not as important as them being "right".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I believe the vast majority of these are privileged people whose family wealth will shield them from legislation they don't want to be subject to.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Or just white cis straight males, who will be protected from much of it as well.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about a more nuanced approach, such as both sides are shit. One side is clearly a bit less shit than the other, and so, I'll vote for that side, out of duress. I don't want to, I want to vote someone I actually believe in. I can't say many good things about the party I'm voting for, but I can't say ANYTHING good about their only viable opponent. And so, in an effort to keep the worst case scenario from happening, I'm going to vote for the only viable option.

This is the core of the "both sides" argument to me. We're going to vote dem. But we cannot forget that neither of these parties are the ones we want. It's important to make that known. We are not voting for you because we like you, we're voting for you because we REALLY DON'T LIKE THE OTHER ONE. As long as we keep talking about that, as long as that very critical voice isn't silenced, we can slowly move the needle, until eventually one election we'll actually be able to elect the one we want.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as we keep talking about that, as long as that very critical voice isn’t silenced, we can slowly move the needle, until eventually one election we’ll actually be able to elect the one we want.

Which is why centrists are so keen on silence from their critics to the left. And only ever the left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Amen! I feel like my post history is 90% calling out these bullshit accounts, and 10% random other non-political stuff.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

That’s almost all I do here. These people should be outed for what they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That is why every time someone brings up Genocide Joe, I bring up Turbo Genocide Donny

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm absolutely voting for Biden and everyone should, because he is the best viable candidate on literally every issue, including Palestine.

That said, he has openly and loudly taken Israel's side for months. As a result, he's made himself an avatar for all the other US institutions that are openly against any criticism of Israel or support for Palestinians. Even if he has secretly been doing everything he can to stop the killing all this time—which I doubt—he had still fucked up massively when it come to avoiding the blowback from other groups' attempts to crush anyone who speaks out, including agencies his administration controls.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great work on the peace deal, fellas. I think we can treat ourselves to another 20 billion of bombs to Israel to celebrate.

Second Edit: Let's also not forget that Israel is a nuclear power. What do you think happens when Israel's back is against the wall, they're running out of conventional weapons, and Iran and/or other groups decide to take advantage?*

Should we allow Russia to just run over Ukraine? They have the largest nuclear arsenal on Earth. Who knows what happens when their backs are against the wall.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's almost like if the US just turns its back on Israel, we'd lose our leverage to press a negotiated agreement

No kidding huh, I can't believe people don't see this. You want to influence Israel? You can't do that if you cut off communication and shun them.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not continuing to provide them with weapons of war while they are actively committing genocide is not cutting off communication and shunning them.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It's almost like if the US just turns its back on Israel, we'd lose our leverage to press a negotiated agreement, which would surely not end with Israel digging in their heels even further. (/s)

How is this distinct from the current situation, where Israel has killed at least 35,000 people, is starving around a million more, shows no signs of changing course, and also we are giving them bombs to carry it out?

The time to start applying gentle pressure was about 8 months ago.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Israel's pack is against the wall against... Hamas?

They managed to push those bastards back, before they've destroyed the Gaza strip.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What do you think happens when Israel's back is against the wall, they're running out of conventional weapons, and Iran and/or other groups decide to take advantage?

Do not misrepresent what you know full well I am talking about.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)