this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
880 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7766 readers
2629 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 103 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Yep, not voting is unironically pretty much the same as voting for the party you least want in charge.

Because you're making it that much more likely.

Don't throw away a right that your ancestors fought for, as it may result in future generations no longer having that right.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Hitler's government was a popular government; the vast majority of Germans preferred the rule of gangsters to the effort of thinking and doing for themselves. They abdicated their franchise.

[...]

The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. "We ignored Hitler," he said. "We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all."

They thought of the government as "They." The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.

—Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Similarly, MLK saw "the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice" as the biggest impediment to civil rights.

The bottom line is that being secure enough in your position in society to think you don't have to engage in politics, or that you can afford to vote your principles instead of tactically, is itself a form of privilege. Those sorts of privileged people think themselves neutral or uninvolved or maybe (in the case of professed leftists refusing to vote Dem as a protest) on their own third side, but the reality is that they are the right-wing authoritarians' greatest ally every single time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lol imagine thinking "moderate white" doesn't perfectly describe the majority of people walking into the 2020 primaries and voting for Joe Biden.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong about the primary, but you are wrong to conflate the primary with the general election when it's the latter that we're talking about here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Lol so I'm "radical" in the primaries when I don't vote for Biden but I'm "moderate" in the general when I don't vote for Biden?

That's not how labels work sir.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The POTUS, from the party most opposed to civil rights act, is who signed it into law, very much so a white moderate more devoted to order. So, I'm gonna take a stance and say MLK was wrong about that one if that was his take before he died.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

That's not how it went, though. It's, in fact, the opposite of how it went. Hitler had relatively little popular support, but full support of the industrial elite. It's blaming the people for the crimes of the elite. "They abdicated their franchise" no, fuckface, half of them voted communist. "We ignored Hitler" no, fuckface, you put him in power because you thought he'd be malleable.

I'm not surprised Heinlein bought it, though. And I'm not surprised people here are buying it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It's funny that both democrats and third party voters will look at your comment and think you're on their side.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, I didn't intend on voting for Trump but, fine, you've convinced me.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago

Hey, as long as you vote. Everyone should vote.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Yes, you of course weren't already going to do that. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, mathematically it’s only half as bad.

-1 lesser evil +1 greater evil

Vs.

-1 lesser evil +0 greater evil

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your math is wrong. You wouldn't be cancelling out the greater evil with the vote for the lesser evil, so its actually twice as bad (or 4x what you were thinking).

0 lesser evil +1 greater evil

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Exactly.

There is unfortunately no option to wind up with a non-evil result, your only options are greater evil result or lesser evil result.

By voting 3rd party you didn't reduce the chance of greater evil result, AND you didn't increase the chance of lesser evil result.