politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
She knows she has little to gain personally from calling for Biden to drop out and potentially has a lot to gain if she sides with him and he ends up winning. She's a savvy political operator and deeply cynical.
She's savvy, but she's one of the least cynical of the bunch.
She saw how they stitched up Jamal Bowman and chose to protect her job. It's pretty damn cynical.
She's playing the cynical game of the Democratic party. I don't know if it will pay off.
But fuck she is WAY better than my gerrymandered representative who is a full corporate military machine.
So I don't exactly have a better representative to even reference let alone represent me. So I'll take that cynicism until I can get that changed.
You get the cynicism because you keep taking it, it really can't change as long as you're willing to settle.
Catch 22
I mean she isn't my representative so there isn't really a taking it or settling at work here. I'm trying to oust my own zionist rep where there's actually a shot.
I just get that she's up shit creek so I don't expect her to have a paddle.
Honestly I am more frustrated with the failure to leverage her support. The whole 'Squad' and Justice Democrats as a whole should be out laying out leverage to back Biden instead of the 'Welp, he's the nominee!' nonsense. If she isn't getting any support then I got some criticisms for more than just AOC here.
This seems kind of like the difference between Bernie and Warren in 2020. Both agreed that the primary was over and their previous foe was important to support. Bernie did an admirable job and brought the party together to support Biden. Warren did the same, but she also got a bunch of her personnel picks to staff various agencies. Unifying in a big allied tent is good, but the side you're unifying with should also be moving towards you as well. That's what makes it unity rather than just submission.
And I will fully admit that Bernie may have demanded something behind the scenes, and that Warren's people may simply have been more attractive because they were better prepared and vetted, but despite becoming the main progressive in the primary, the progressive wins in staffing sure look like Warren's doing.
Warren stayed in the race until after Biden cinched the nominatiom because her dropping out would have likely meant her support would have shifted for Sanders. That was the deal she got, like Buttigeig got a cabinet position for dropping out to back Biden for example. Same with Clyburn's kids getting appointments for SC.
It's definitely the right move for her at this point. If Biden steps aside (or dies) before the election, the Democrats aren't going to nominate someone who didn't back Biden. Publicly backing lets her stay on the team, and maybe one day have a shot at the Presidency herself (assuming we get more than four more years before fascism wins).
It's the right move for her career, anyway.