Zaktor

joined 2 years ago
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Then they're going to stop paying taxes you morons!

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

You don't have to speculate though. You could look for more information, as another user did, or just agree that it seems over the top and possibly exaggerated. Instead you're making up scenarios for why an egregious act must have been warranted. And surprise surprise, the actual facts bear no resemblance to what you imagined.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pardons don't make the crime they committed legal.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago

A security clearance does not grant you access to information, it's a minimum prerequisite before someone else decides you have an active need to know something and then shares the information.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

During Biden's term they got even more judges confirmed. He should have knocked off a few Supremes so he could match him there, but I'm just pointing out that it's not like Republican terms are particularly productive.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Murkowski? McCain (specifically thinking about ACA)?

The Republicans have been stopped by their own politicians playing 'maverick' before. You forget how little got done in the Senate during Trump's first turn.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

Neoliberals neoliberaled.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not "rather than identity politics". What about that makes you think they're not about social justice? They're dedicated progressives, not class reductionists.

A multi-racial party doesn't mean you downplay racism, it means the party has solidarity across races. That's what solidarity is.

https://thegrio.com/2025/03/07/anti-dei-efforts-are-anti-black-activist-maurice-mitchell-lays-out-the-consequences-of-diversity-rollbacks-and-a-plan-for-resistance/

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If Democrats wanted to, they could run a candidate against him.

They actually couldn't really. Bernie wins the Democratic primary in his state then just runs as an Independent. He's the chosen representative of the Vermont Democratic Party.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My SO and I have joked that while I could never win a local election, if I ran, I might just be able to get within punching range of our shitty representative.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Sure thing, wish for this perfect future where good politicians just spring up organically rather than expect a politician here and now in reality to have any sort of successful plan.

And give me a break with this 'blame Warren' crap. When she was leading and Bernie had just had a heart attack, he stayed in rather than bowing out to build momentum. Two egotistical politicians both thought they had the right (or responsibility) to stay in a race to represent their ideas and politics. Warren's voters definitely 100% would not have made Bernie win, and in all likelihood a Warren polling at 50% still wouldn't have caused a runway as all the others suddenly decided the economics of M4A was the most important issue for Democrats to spend the entire primary on.

Except now one of these egotistical politicians is preparing people to take over and the other doesn't seem to have any plan for what happens after he retires or (more likely) dies in office.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

That's the whole thing this is all about. A new party competes against the main party in general elections. Otherwise, whatever the name says, it's just a caucus. The Democrats already have the Justice Democrats recruiting progressives to run in primaries. They also have the Working Families Party, which is closer to a real party than either the Justice Democrats or the Tea Party, but they still don't really compete with the Democrats outside of primaries (they go "head to head" in New York, but usually to represent votes for the same candidates).

 

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday cleared a national defense authorization bill celebrated for troop pay raises but condemned by Democrats for targeting transgender children in military families, sending the bill to President Joe Biden’s desk.

Senators voted 83-12, with five not voting, to approve the $884.9 billion National Defense Authorization Act that received bipartisan praise for the pay bump, upgrades to military housing and investments in artificial intelligence and other advanced technology.

But the annual legislation drew ire this year from Democrats for a provision banning the military’s health program from covering certain treatments for youth experiencing gender dysphoria, defined by doctors as the mismatch between a person’s sex assigned at birth and the gender they experience in everyday life.

All Democrats present for the Dec. 11 U.S. House vote opposed the defense package, which passed along party lines under the Republican majority.

The White House has not released its position on the bill, as it generally does with legislation ready for the president’s signature.

 

Harris only received five percent of Republican votes — less than the six percent Joe Biden won in 2020 when he beat Trump, as well as the seven percent won by Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she lost to him. While Harris won independents and moderates, she did so by smaller margins than Biden did in 2020.

Meanwhile, Harris lost households earning under $100,000, while Democratic turnout collapsed. Votes are still being counted, but Harris is on pace to underperform Biden’s 2020 totals by millions of votes.

 

Israel’s ousted defence minister, Yoav Gallant, has reportedly said the army has achieved all its objectives in Gaza and that Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a hostages-for-peace deal against the advice of his own security establishment.

Gallant was speaking to hostages’ families on Thursday, two days after being sacked by Netanyahu, and reports of his remarks quickly surfaced in Israeli media.

“There’s nothing left in Gaza to do. The major achievements have been achieved,” Channel 12 news quoted him as saying. “I fear we are staying there just because there is a desire to be there.”

 

The editors of Israel's oldest newspaper on Wednesday published an editorial decrying the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from northern Gaza amid a ferocious Israeli offensive there that's killed more than 1,000 people over the past three weeks.

Original paywalled editorial in Haaretz.

 

Vice President Kamala Harris proposed increasing the long-term capital gains tax rate to 28% for wealthy Americans during an economic speech in New Hampshire on Wednesday, breaking with the policy laid out by President Joe Biden in his 2025 budget by suggesting a lower rate.

The current long-term capital gains tax rate – 20%, plus an additional 3.8% tax on higher earners – is paid when an investment is sold, or gains are realized. The Biden budget proposes raising that rate to the top rate he wants to levy on ordinary income – 39.6% – for households with taxable income over $1 million. Harris, the people familiar with the matter say, believes 39.6% is too high.

While Harris still supports taxing the wealthiest individuals and corporations at higher rates – as Biden’s budget also calls for – she believes that a lower capital gains rate would incentivize investors to put more money into startups and small businesses. She has also proposed increasing the corporate tax rate to 28%, up from the current 21% rate set by Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

 

Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced Wednesday that there are currently enough votes in the Senate to suspend the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade and abortion rights if Democrats win control of the House and keep the Senate and White House.

“We will suspend the filibuster. We have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade,” Warren said on ABC’s “The View.”

She said if Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress in 2025, “the first vote Democrats will take in the Senate, the first substantive vote, will be to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

 

A new budget by a large and influential group of House Republicans calls for raising the Social Security retirement age for future retirees and restructuring Medicare.

For Social Security, the budget endorses "modest adjustments to the retirement age for future retirees to account for increases in life expectancy." It calls for lowering benefits for the highest-earning beneficiaries. And it emphasizes that those ideas are not designed to take effect immediately: "The RSC Budget does not cut or delay retirement benefits for any senior in or near retirement."

Biden has blasted Republican proposals for the retirement programs, promising that he will not cut benefits and instead proposing in his recent White House budget to cover the future shortfall by raising taxes on upper earners.

 

Harlan Crow (of the Clarence Thomas patronage scandals) donated the max individual donation ($3,300) to Cornel West's campaign, which invited obvious criticism.

Text of his response on Twitter:

As an independent candidate and a free Black man, I accept donations within the limits of no PACs or corporate interest groups that have strings attached. I am unbought and unbossed. Despite my deep political differences with brother Harlan Crow (who is an anti-Trump Republican), I’ve known him in a non-political setting for some years and I pray for his precious family. I find it hypocritical for those who highlight his $3300 donation to my campaign but can’t say a mumbling word about the PAC-driven billion dollars to support the genocidal attack in Gaza sponsored by their candidate! I’m fighting for Truth, Justice, and Love! Onward!

Frankly, the pleasant words make this look much worse than just saying "if some asshole wants to send me money, I'll keep it". Sounds like someone he wants to keep on the good side of, but y'know they're only political differences, not stuff that really matters.

view more: next ›