Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Depends on how you slice em. A white person from Minnesota is very different from a white person in NYC, but it's often useful to group both of them as white to contrast with, say, Asian. In the same sense, Asian can mean Chinese, and Chinese can mean Taiwanese, etc
Grouping people based on similarities is not inherently bad.
"White" is not a "similarity" - it's a racial classification.
Splitting hairs
The supposed "racial commonality" proselytized by white supremacists is purely a product of "scientific racism."
No... it's not a question of splitting hairs.
I thought the last of you "race isn't real lalala if I don't acknowledge it it's not real" people got shamed into silence decades ago.
You are confusing this with the "see no white supremacism, hear no white supremacism, speak no white supremacism" respectability politics that has been the default camouflage of liberal political establishments throughout the (so-called) "Cold War" up till today.
And no - they are still at it today.
Same thing.
"Race isn't real" provides cover for less blatant forms of racism, especially institutional bias. Also, it's an obviously stupid philosophy.
No, they are not. White supremacism is very real - if you exist in the colonized world (as both of us do) it's so real that it literally dictates everything about your reality. That is why we say places like the US (and places like Canada, South Africa or Israel) is fundamentally white supremacist.
Race itself isn't real and has never been - apart from a reasonable command of the English language and our place on the racialized caste system dictated by white supremacism, me and you have absolutely nothing in common. In our fundamentally white supremacist world, it's the latter that is socially constructed as important in our respective societies. That doesn't make our (supposed) "race" any more biologically real.
lol
I can't imagine the mindset of someone so divorced from reality. It must be like living in a cult.
Sure, Clyde... the colonialist genocides that created the world you exist in isn't real - it's just a product of the fevered imaginations of leftist. Nothing to worry about.
Now just carry on as normal and continue to believe the cheap labor that built everything around you with cheap resources was all conjured up with liberal fairy magic instead. Go be white.
It's decidedly not useful to say they have the same culture, though, because they don't. There are common elements, but they're nowhere near the majority, especially comparing those common elements to the common elements they also share with most black Americans because they're American.
Well that's a ridiculous take. So it becomes impossible to discuss culture?
Black people from Chicago, St Louis, and Oakland have cultural similarities. If you refuse to acknowledge that, you've taken "I don't see race" so far you've looped back around to racism. This is exactly what I was getting at with the question.
It's perfectly possible to discuss culture. Race is a small part of their culture, and you talking about "you must not know black people if the black people you know are different than the ones from my neighborhood" is racist as fuck. You're disqualifying a hell of a lot of black people from "really being black" with that shit.
Of course they do. Those are all urban environments. Most white people from the same neighborhoods will have mostly similar cultures, because, like I said, race is a small part of that culture.
Is it an important part? Absolutely. There are systemic issues that they are exposed to because of their minority status that white people in the same environment are not. But there are plenty of black people who aren't from urban environments, and many of them are as different from black urban culture as they are from white urban culture.
Absolutely not true!
Wikipedia has an entire article on African-American Culture.
Is Wikipedia claiming that your black friends aren't really black if they don't match some arbitrary bullshit?
Descriptions of groups of people are not 100% binding to all members of that group. They are broad generalities.
Well that's a ridiculous take. So it becomes impossible to discuss culture?
Black people from Chicago, St Louis, and Oakland have cultural similarities. If you refuse to acknowledge that, you've taken "I don't see race" so far you've looped back around to racism. This is exactly what I was getting at with the question.