1017
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don't give them money for their product? If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.

Analogies don't indicate a similar level of morality. They are used to explain points to people who, for some reason, are unwilling or unable to otherwise understand.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If your head was any further down in the sand, the magma would melt it.

this is a thought terminating cliche

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You honestly think that factory farm emissions font change if people don’t give them money for their product?

have you tried that?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I have. The millions of us who choose not to help those assholes causes them to make less e missions. Unfortunately there are still people like you who live without caring about anyone but their own immediate gratification.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

causes them to make less e missions.

that has never happened

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Analogies don’t indicate a similar level of morality.

i didnt suggest they did. i'm saying that buying food is disanalagous to rape.

edit

to be clear, rape is wrong. buying food is not. you don't not-rape in order to reduce rape. you don't-rape because rape is wrong. by contrast, the goal of not-buying meat is to reduce the environmental impact of the meat industry. if that doesn't work, then not-buying meat is not a moral duty (at least, not for that reason. it's possible there is some other reason, but that's not the topic being discussed).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What if you buy food from someone you know murdered children to get it? It's so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act. If you are interested in having philosophical conversations, then you really need to go back to the basics. At this point, you're trying to join an archery competition with a nurf toy. There are undeniably immoral ways to get food. Destroying the planet and torturing animals for slightly cheaper food that you do not absolutely need to survive is absolutely immoral. The reason it is so hard for you to see this is because you are an addict making excuses. Not because you are starving and need the cheapest, most despicable food.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It’s so obviously wrong that buying food is never an immoral act.

I allowed that there may be some reason buying some food might be immoral.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's progress! You're on a good track. Not sure if you're the same one I sent this link to or not, but if you want to see the living conditions of the animals in the meat system are, here you go. You can judge the morality of it on your own.

https://youtu.be/LQRAfJyEsko

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (123 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
1017 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73067 readers
2279 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS