this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
270 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45492 readers
2919 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/18013671

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

local government = revenue from taxes. If the home owners don't have the money to buy solar, being taxed enough by the local government to pay for solar isn't going to work either.

power company = nearly all are either co-ops (owned by the consumers) where you'd get the same problem with taxing, or private companies which are for-profit driven industries.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m wondering how many residential solar panels our current oil and gas subsidies could fund. Wishful thinking I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you're actually interested in affecting change, you're going to need to do more than say "someone else should pay for it". Even more if you're saying "something I don't support is getting money, and I want that money to go to the thing I support instead". Unless you happen to be an authoritarian dictator where your will is law, you have to work within the system if you want change. So far I'm not seeing what you're posting as a path that will become reality.

If I've mistaken your intentions and you just want to have someone else solve the big problem without addressing any of the smaller problems that creates, then I supposed your work is done. Carry on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Its not just his opinion: its pretty well established that we need to develop this for our future

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Its not just his opinion: its pretty well established that we need to develop this for our future

I agree we need to develop it. What is unrealistic is saying "thing X should happen and someone else should pay for it exclusively". That's what will keep this a pipe dream instead of turning it into actual reality.