this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
660 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23703 readers
2418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced Wednesday that there are currently enough votes in the Senate to suspend the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade and abortion rights if Democrats win control of the House and keep the Senate and White House.

“We will suspend the filibuster. We have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade,” Warren said on ABC’s “The View.”

She said if Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress in 2025, “the first vote Democrats will take in the Senate, the first substantive vote, will be to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And that's a whole lot of ignoring reality on your part.

Our government, for better AND for worse, was structured so that a president couldn't go rogue and do whatever they want. For most mundane things, they need a simple majority in both houses. For serious rewriting of fundamental rules (amendments), you need super majorities. And a SCOTUS to safeguard.

This is so that the next Nixon, the next Trump (who might just be Trump) can't single handedly upend this country and bend it to their wills. Like Putin did.

However, the GOP has corrupted all branches, all levels of the courts, including SCOTUS. This is why they get away with all the shit that they do, while the Dems seem impotent. Because they have spent generations undermining our checks and balances while the Dems have mostly played fair, albeit with a fair amount of corporate subservience.

You rage against a machine without understanding the parameters. The Dems are shackled by law. And the key to it all was the GOP owning the SCOTUS, thanks to all you conscientious objectors that let Trump gain power and heavily stack the courts. Because you think both parties are the fucking same.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Why are the Dems shackled by law but not Republicans? I'll save you the time: it was designed that way. Progress is hard, regression is easy.

Why do we, the people, allow this system to exist when it conclusively proves to us year after year that it is not a government that works for us?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Our government, for better AND for worse, was structured so that a president couldn't go rogue and do whatever they want.

No longer, apparently.

However, the GOP has corrupted all branches, all levels of the courts, including SCOTUS.

True. Because the Dems have let them by not fighting back.

This is why they get away with all the shit that they do, while the Dems ~~seem~~ act impotent.

Fixed that for you.

Because they have spent generations undermining our checks and balances while the Dems have ~~mostly played fair~~ done fuck-all

Fixed that one for you as well. Weird that you keep making mistakes that excuse the spineless inaction of the Dems 🤔

albeit with a ~~fair~~ huge amount of corporate subservience

Finally being halfway honest about their fault in this. Let's see if it lasts.

The Dems are shackled by law

Nope, didn't even last two sentences. They're shackling themselves and blaming things like rules, procedures and rotating villains that are within their power to change or overcome.

thanks to all you conscientious objectors that let Trump gain power

I was wondering when that particular victim blaming strawman was gonna rear its ugly head..

For the record, I've never not voted or told others not to vote.

And the vast majority of Bernie voters voted for Hillary in the general. Unlike Hillary's PUMA and others, who voted for McCain or not at all in much bigger percentages.

Because you think both parties are the fucking same.

Another strawman.

Just because I realize that the Dems are doing an awful job doesn't mean that I think they're anywhere near as awful as the literal fascists on the other side of the aisle. I don't.

Conversely, though, the other party being a literal fascist party doesn't mean that we should demand less from Dems. On the contrary, this is when we MOST need them to fight tooth and nail and get things done!

a whole lot of ignoring reality on your part

I'm not the one doing that, apparatchik.

You rage against a machine without understanding the parameters

I understand just fine. You, on the other hand, reflexively believe everything the machine spits out, even though much of is demonstrably false.

People like you putting the bar at "just slightly better than Republicans" and demanding that everyone else do the same for decades is how the Dems have gotten away with just putting band aids on the limbs Republicans break and moving right to chase the mythical "undecided voter" even as they decry rising polarization.

Which in turn is how Republicans have gotten away with becoming a fascist party and still remaining competitive in a country that ascended to their current place in the world by fighting fascists in WWII.

Demand better. BE better.

Be better.